Table 4.

Change in relationship-enhancing attributions from Task 1 to Task 2 by drug condition and level of intimate partner violence (IPV)

Model	Men			Women
Psychological Victimization	B	SE	p	B	SE	p
Intercept	−0.16	1.03	0.877	0.33	1.26	0.795
Drug Condition (Placebo v. OT)	−1.83	1.49	0.231	−0.69	1.65	0.682
IPV	−0.03	0.03	0.405	0.02	0.03	0.589
Drug Condition × IPV	0.05	0.04	0.191	−0.04	0.04	0.295
Psychological Perpetration
Intercept	−0.36	1.04	0.729	1.53	1.41	0.288
Drug Condition (Placebo v. OT)	−1.43	1.49	0.346	−2.05	1.74	0.250
IPV	−0.01	0.02	0.582	−0.03	0.05	0.555
Drug Condition × IPV	0.04	0.04	0.306	0.01	0.05	0.883
Physical Victimization
Intercept	−0.92	0.87	0.300	0.20	0.88	0.820
Drug Condition (Placebo v. OT)	−0.42	1.18	0.727	−1.12	1.20	0.361
IPV	0.03	0.09	0.726	0.19	0.11	0.106
Drug Condition × IPV	−0.01	0.09	0.887	−0.21	0.12	0.081
Physical Perpetration
Intercept	−0.77	0.88	0.389	0.54	0.96	0.578
Drug Condition (Placebo v. OT)	0.27	1.25	0.832	−1.09	1.33	0.420
IPV	0.00	0.14	0.995	0.08	0.14	0.553
Drug Condition × IPV	−0.10	0.18	0.561	−0.15	0.15	0.316

Note. Statistically significant effects at p < 0.05 are bolded. Effects that trend toward significance at p < 0.10 are bolded and italicized.