Table 5.

Change in distress-maintaining attributions from Task 1 to Task 2 by drug condition and level of intimate partner violence (IPV)

Model	Men			Women
Psychological Victimization	B	SE	p	B	SE	p
Intercept	0.72	0.89	0.425	−2.71	0.92	0.007
Drug Condition (Placebo v. OT)	−1.77	1.29	0.184	2.18	1.21	0.083
IPV	−0.01	0.03	0.591	0.07	0.02	0.004
Drug Condition × IPV	0.02	0.03	0.575	−0.03	0.03	0.254
Psychological Perpetration
Intercept	−0.36	1.04	0.729	−2.60	1.07	0.023
Drug Condition (Placebo v. OT)	−1.43	1.49	0.346	2.05	1.32	0.133
IPV	−0.01	0.02	0.582	0.08	0.04	0.025
Drug Condition × IPV	0.04	0.04	0.306	−0.04	0.04	0.280
Physical Victimization
Intercept	−0.04	0.71	0.961	−1.14	0.75	0.753
Drug Condition (Placebo v. OT)	−1.03	0.97	0.300	1.34	1.02	1.021
IPV	0.08	0.07	0.243	0.17	0.09	0.094
Drug Condition × IPV	−0.07	0.07	0.335	−0.11	0.10	0.099
Physical Perpetration
Intercept	0.17	0.72	0.812	−1.10	0.80	0.803
Drug Condition (Placebo v. OT)	−1.68	1.02	0.114	0.93	1.11	1.106
IPV	0.07	0.12	0.581	0.15	0.11	0.114
Drug Condition × IPV	0.05	0.14	0.731	−0.04	0.12	0.124

Note. Statistically significant effects at p < 0.05 are bolded. Effects that trend toward significance at p < 0.10 are bolded and italicized.