Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Caries Res. 2018 Jun 6;53(1):24–32. doi: 10.1159/000488686

Table 2.

Characteristics of the included studies

Study/Country Duration of follow-up (months) Age of participants (years) and caries experience at baseline Intervention Comparison
Bijella, Brazil 24 3 – 4 dfs=3.42-4.59 12% SDF applications for 2 min, onto all tooth surfaces; 3 groups (every 3, 6 and 12 months) No treatment
Dos Santos, Brazil 12 5 – 6 dft=4.56-4.71 30% SDF applications for 3 min, onto all carious tooth surfaces (once) GIC used as interim therapeutic restoration repeated at the 6-month evaluation if lost
Llodra, Cuba 36 6 or more (mean 6.29, SD 0.48) dmfs=3.35-3.68 38% SDF applications for 3 min, onto all carious primary tooth surfaces (every 6 months) No treatment
Chu, China 30 3 - 5 (mean 4, SD 0.8) dmfsant=4.73 38% SDF applications (time not reported), onto active carious upper anterior tooth surfaces (every 12 months) FV (every 3 months) and water (interval not reported), applications onto active carious upper anterior tooth surfaces

SD= standard deviation, SDF= silver diamine fluoride, FV= 5% sodium fluoride varnish, GIC= high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement, dfs= mean number of decayed and filled tooth surfaces in primary teeth, dft= mean number of decayed and filled primary teeth, dmfs= mean number of decayed, missing and filled tooth surfaces in primary teeth, dmfsant=mean number of decayed, missing and filled tooth surfaces in anterior primary teeth