Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2018 Nov;38(6):374–379. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000330

Table 2.

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection–Specific Information Received or Obtained Post-Diagnosis

n (%)
Information provided by provider at the time of SCAD diagnosisa
 Verbal information from medical provider 265 (72)
 No information about SCAD 97 (26)
 Written information from a SCAD- or heart-focused organization (eg, SCAD Alliance, American Heart Association) 45 (12)
 Scientific papers about SCAD 16 (4)
 Information about a cardiovascular/heart disease other than SCAD 9 (3)
 Recruitment information for SCAD-related research study 5 (1)
 Information about SCAD obtained from the internet 5 (1)
 Information from other sources not listed 5 (1)
Perceived quality of information received from provider at the time of diagnosis
 “Too much/too difficult to understand” 2 (0.5)
 “Adequate/easy to understand” 64 (17)
 “Insufficient/inadequate” 299 (82)
Most helpful sources of SCAD information obtained post-diagnosis
 Internet search 191 (52)
 Support/education associations 97 (26)
 Academic/professional journal articles 36 (10)
 Doctor and/or other health care professionals 32 (9)
 Facebook page for SCAD survivors 7 (2)
 Other survivors’ word of mouth 4 (1)

Abbreviation: SCAD, spontaneous coronary artery dissection.

a

Percentages not cumulative because participants were asked to select all options that applied.