Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2018 Nov;38(6):374–379. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000330

Table 3.

Referral Resources and Preferred Post-SCAD Treatmentsa

Perceived Program Helpfulnessb
Referral resources offered post-SCAD
 Cardiac rehabilitation 265 (72) 6.84 ± 3.06
 Counseling 91 (25) 6.25 ± 2.70
 Heart-specific support groups 59 (16) 5.64 ± 3.11
 Stress management 36 (10) 5.97 ± 2.61
 Exercise programs other than cardiac rehabilitation 25 (7) 7.00 ± 3.06
 “Other” sources of support 9 (3) 4.00 ± 3.37
Interest in psychosocial interventions post-SCAD
 Online patient education/support group with a professional leader 168 (46)
 In-person patient education/support group with a professional leader 99 (27)
 Online peer-facilitated patient education/support group 29 (8)
 Not interested in participating in a psychosocial support group 31 (8)
 In-person peer-facilitated patient education/support group 25 (7)
 Interested in “other” psychosocial support group not listed 10 (3)

Abbreviation: SCAD, spontaneous coronary artery dissection.

a

Data reported as number (%) or mean ± standard deviation.

b

Program helpfulness rated on a 10-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = “Not at all helpful” to 10 = “Extremely helpful.”