Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 7;9:1774. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01774

Table 1.

Differences between DCM patients and controls.

Indices Males (N = 150)
Females (N = 152)
Controls (N = 85) DCM patients (N = 65) P Controls (N = 117) DCM patients (N = 35) P
Demographic data
Age, years 53.4 11.9 52.8 14.1 0.775 54.7 14.1 62.8 8.7* 0.002
Deceleration and acceleration capacity
AC, ms -7.9 2.3 -5.0 2.4 <0.001 -7.5 1.8 -4.1 1.4 <0.001
DC, ms 7.6 2.0 4.6 2.3 <0.001 7.1 1.6 3.9 1.3 <0.001
Echocardiography
LAD, mm 38.4 5.9 48.0 10.0 <0.001 37.3 5.6 47.6 7.5 <0.001
LVEDD, mm 49.1 5.5 71.2 8.9 <0.001 48.4 4.2 67.8 7.3 <0.001
LVESD, mm 31.2 6.2 59.6 10.3 <0.001 30.1 3.8 57.9 8.9 <0.001
LVEF, % 65.6 7.8 30.3 7.1 <0.001 67.2 6.1 30.5 8.0 <0.001

Data are presented as means ± standard deviations (SDs). Differences between groups were compared using Student’s t-test. DCM, dilated cardiomyopathy; AC, heart rate acceleration capacity; DC, heart rate deceleration capacity; LAD, left atrial diameter; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVESD, left ventricular end-systolic diameter; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction. , female DCM patients were significantly older than male DCM patients (P < 0.001).