Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 7;9:2466. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02466

Table 1.

Ratings of types of global life narrative coherence.

Type of global coherence Definitions
Temporal coherence
  • simple 1

    - One can never tell when and in what order something occurred.

  • simple 2

    - One can almost never tell when and in what order something occurred.

  • simple 3

    - One can often not tell when and in what order something occurred.

  • simple 4

    - One can partly tell when and in what order something occurred, but partly one cannot.

  • simple 5

    - One can mostly tell when and in what order something occurred.

  • simple 6

    - One can almost always tell when and in what order something occurred.

  • simple 7

    - It is always crystal clear when and in what order something occurred.


Causal-motivational coherence
  • simple 1

    - No development of the personality at all becomes clear, merely superficial changes.

  • simple 2

    - No development of the personality becomes clear, merely changes in preferences, specific attitudes or habits.

  • simple 3

    - A development of the personality is claimed but not substantiated or a development of personality is described but not designated as such.

  • simple 4

    - A development of the personality is basically substantiated by the events described, but it is not elaborated upon.

  • simple 5

    - The development of the personality becomes clear on the whole through some of the events described, however, not to a full extent.

  • simple 6

    - The development of the personality becomes clear through some of the events described, but is not always comprehensible down to the smallest detail.

  • simple 7

    - The development of the personality becomes clear in its turning-points and its motives.


Thematic coherence
  • simple 1

    - Between the individual episodes narrated no connection is discernible.

  • simple 2

    - Only one theme is addressed, which is why the connection between the episodes is not abstract but concrete.

  • simple 3

    - With some episodes differing in content it is possible to recognize a common motive, theme or a thematic category.

  • simple 4

    - Through episodes heterogeneous in content, thematic or motivational similarities can be clearly discerned, which are not, however, explicitly named.

  • simple 5

    - There is a basic attempt to establish a connection between heterogeneous episodes, between most episodes, however, the connection remains unclear or is exclusively implicit.

  • simple 6

    - Between many heterogeneous episodes a connection is established, but in part the connection remains unclear or is exclusively implicit.

  • simple 7

    - Between the various heterogeneous episodes there is established a connection in a logical and comprehensible fashion.