Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 17;3(1):27–41. doi: 10.1210/js.2018-00123

Table 2.

Overview of Mutations in the Human LEPR

First Author and Year of Publication Overview: LEPR Mutations
Number of Cases (n) Case ID Patient Nationality Mutation in the Coding DNA (c.) Mutation in the Mature Protein (p.) Affected Domain Provided Functional Analysis
Clement et al. 1998 [6] 3 Clem_1.1, Clem_1.2, Clem_1.3 Algerian c.2597 + 1G>A n.a. FNIII PCR and sequencing
Farooqi et al. 2007 [30] 2 Far_2.2, Far_2.1 Turkish n.a. 11-bp del in codon 70 NTD In silico
Farooqi et al. 2007 [30] 3 Far_4.3, Far_4.2, Far_4.1 Southern European n.a. p.W31* NTD n.a.
Farooqi et al. 2007 [30] 1 Far_3 Iranian n.a. 66-bp del in codon 514 CRHII In silico
Farooqi et al. 2007 [30] 1 Far_5 Turkish c.1226C>A p.A409E IGD In vitro
Farooqi et al. 2007 [30] 1 Far_6 Norwegian n.a. p.W664R FNIII In vitro
Farooqi et al. 2007; [30] Ulm 2 Far_7; Ulm_3 White (United Kingdom); German c.2051A>C p.H684P FNIII In vitro
Le Beyec et al. [35] 2013 1 Bey_1 French c.1871dupA p.N624Kfs*21 CRHII + FNIII In silico
Kakar et al. 2013 [40] 5 Kak_1.1.1, Kak_1.1.2, Kak_1.2, Kak_1.3. Kak_1.4 Pakistani c.1603 + 5G>C p.R468Sfs*33 CRHII In silico
Gill et al. 2013 [42] 2 Gil_2.1, Gil_2.2 Sudanese c.479delA p.H160Lfs*10 CRHI In silico
Gill et al. 2013 [42] 1 Gil_1 Guinean c.556delT p.C186Afs*28 CRHI In silico
Saeed et al. 2014 and 2015 [34, 38] 4 Sae_2, Sae2_3, Sae2_4, Sae2_5 Pakistani c.2396-1G>T n.a. FNIII In silico
Saeed et al. 2014 and 2015 [34, 38] 2 Sae_1, Sae2_6 Pakistani c.1675G>A p.W558* CRHII In silico Ilumina, Sanger
Huvenne et al. 2015 [32] 1 Huv_2 French c.1810T>G p.C604G CRHII In silico
Huvenne et al. 2015 [32] 1 Huv_3 Portuguese c.2357T>C p.L786P FNIII In silico
Huvenne et al. 2015 [32] 1 Huv_4 Turkish c.2491G>A p.H800_N831del FNIII In silico
Huvenne et al. 2015 [32] 5 Huv_5, Huv_6, Huv_7, Huv_8, Huv_9 French (Reunion Island) Del exon 6–8 p.P166Cfs*7 CRHI In silico, PCR
Ulm 1 Ulm_1 Turkish Del exon 4–20 n.a. CRHI-NTD n.a.
Ulm 1 Ulm_4 German Comp. het. c.2227 T>C and c.2598-3_2607delTAGAATGAAAAAG Comp. het. p.S743P and p.Q865_K870 FNIII + CRHII In silico
Ulm 1 Ulm_5 Turkish p.N154Kfs*3 c.461dupA CRHI In silico
Ulm 1 Ulm_6 German Comp. het. c.1874G>A and c.2051A>C Comp. het. p.W625* and p.H684P FNIII + CRHII In vitro (p.H684P; see Farooqi et al. 2007 [30])
Farooqi et al. 2007 [30] 3 Far_1.3, Far_1.2, Far_1.1 Bangladeshi n.a. 4-bp del in codon 22 NTD In silico
Maezen et al. 2011 [37] 2 Maz_1, Maz_2 Egyptian c.946C>A p.P316T CRHI In silico
Andiran et al. 2011 [31]; Ulm 2 And_1, Ulm_2 Turkish c.946C>A and c. n.a. p.P316T and p.W646C (both homozygous) CRHI + FNIII In silico
Huvenne et al. 2015 [32] 1 Huv_10 French (Reunion Island) Comp. het. c.1604–1G>A and del exon 6–8 Comp. het. p. n.a and p.P166Cfs*7 CRHII + CRHI In silico
Hannema et al. 2016 [33] 1 Han_2 Dutch c.1604–8A>G K536Sfs*34 and p.V535Dfs*3a CRHII In silico
Vauthier et al. 2012 [39] 1 Vau_1 French Del of DNAJC6 and parts of LEPR n.a. NTD + CRII PCR, MPLC
Huvenne et al. 2015 [32] 2 Huv_11.1, Huv_11.2 French Comp. het. c.1264T>C and c.2131dup Comp. het. p.Y422H and p.T711N fs*18 IGD + FNIII In silico
Saeed et al. 2015 [34] 2 Sae2_2.1, Sae2_2.2 Pakistani c.1810T>A p.C604S CRHII In silico
Saeed et al. 2015 [34] 1 Sae2_1 Pakistani Mutation not in transcript n.a. In silico
Hannema et al. 2016 [33] 1 Han_1 Dutch Comp. het. c.1753–1dupG and c.2168C>T Comp. het. p.M585Dfs*2 and p.S723F CRHII In silico Ilumina, Sanger
Farooqi et al. 2007 [30] 1 Far_8 White (United Kingdom) Comp. het. c. n.a. and c.1835G>A Comp. het. 1 bp del in codon 15 and p.R612H NTD + CRHII In vitro (p.R612H)

Included are number of cases, case ID and nationality, location of the mutation in the LEPR protein, affected domain, and provided information about functional analysis. Estimation of the functional relevance of the respective mutation was made based on predefined criteria. Criteria for functional relevance were (1) highly suspicious BMI, (2) hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, (3) consanguineous parents, (4) highly suspicious variant, and (5) conclusive functional analysis. Conclusions on functional relevance are based on the number of fulfilled criteria: “High” indicates high evidence for complete loss of LEPR function (three to five criteria fulfilled); “Probably” indicates that the mutation is probably damaging (two to three criteria); “Low” indicates low evidence for functional relevance, with in vitro analyses necessary to exclude residual function of LEPR (two or fewer criteria).

Abbreviations: c., cDNA position in the gene; comp. het., compound heterozygous; del, deletion; fs, frameshift; HH, hypogonadotropic hypogonadism; MPLC, medium pressure liquid chromatography, n.a., no information available; p., amino acid position in the protein; Rf, residual function; *, premature stop codon.

a

Published as corresponding to p.K597Sfs*34 and p.V596Dfs*3 in the original paper. Based on the experimentally validated changes in the RNA, we assume the correct mutations to be p.K536Sfs*34 and p.V535Dfs*3.