Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 26;37(24):e99333. doi: 10.15252/embj.201899333

Figure 1. Cnot6l expression pattern and phenotype of Cnot6l knockout mice.

Figure 1

  • A, B
    Quantitative RT–PCR results showing relative expression levels of mouse Cnot6 and Cnot6l in oocytes (GV and MII), somatic tissues, ES cells (A), and preimplantation embryos (B). n = 3 biological replicates.
  • C
    Cumulative numbers of pups per female showing fertility of WT and Cnot6l −/− female mice. n = 5 females for each genotype.
  • D
    Representative image results of oocytes collected from oviducts of WT and Cnot6l −/− mice at 16 h after hCG injection. Scale bar, 100 μm. Arrows indicate polar body‐1 (PB1).
  • E
    Confocal microscopy results of oocytes collected from oviducts of WT and Cnot6l −/− mice at 16 h after hCG injection. Scale bar, 20 μm. Arrows indicate spindle poles.
  • F
    Rates of PB1 emission and normal spindle formation in oocytes ovulated by WT and Cnot6l −/− female mice. The numbers of analyzed oocytes are indicated (n).
  • G
    Quantification of preimplantation embryos derived from WT and Cnot6l −/− females that develop to the indicated stages after hCG administration and mated with adult WT males. The numbers of analyzed embryos are indicated (n).
  • H
    Representative images of embryos collected from the oviducts or uteri of WT and Cnot6l −/− female at indicated time points after hCG administration. Scale bar, 100 μm.
Data information: Error bars, SEM. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 by two‐tailed Student's t‐test. n.s.: non‐significant.