Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Stimul. 2018 Aug 18;11(6):1276–1281. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.08.009

Table 1.

Baseline data for participants with typical or atypical BDNF genotype. A two-sided t-test was used to compare the two groups on each baseline behavioral test, age, years of education, and lesion size. Significant group differences are highlighted by bolded text for the p-values in the last column.


Baseline Characteristic Typical BDNF genotype (val/val) N = 36
Atypical BDNF (val/met, met/met) N = 30
Two sided p-value
Mean SD Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI Mean SD Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI

WAB-R AQ 63.5 18.6 57.2 69.8 52.2 19.3 45 59.4 0.01
Naming 80 (treated items) 23.0 18.0 16.9 29.1 14.4 15 8.8 20 0.03
Philadelphia Naming Test 69.3 45.0 54.1 84.5 48.6 38 34.4 62.8 0.04
PNT þ Naming 80 92.3 62.4 71.2 113.4 63.0 52.4 43.4 82.5 0.04
PPTT Total Score 46.6 3.4 45.4 47.7 46.1 4.6 44.4 47.8 0.65
WAIS III Matrix Score 12.4 5.8 10.5 14.4 11.6 4.9 9.7 13.4 0.63
NIH Stroke Scale 4.8 2.9 3.8 5.8 5.2 3.4 4 6.5 0.55
Age 61.9 9.2 58.8 65.0 57.3 11.1 53.2 61.5 0.07
Years of Education 14.8 2.1 14.1 15.5 14.9 2.8 13.9 16 0.74
Time post stroke (months) 50.3 42.8 35.9 64.8 35.5 38.9 21.0 50.0 0.16
Lesion Size 118.5 62.8 97.3 139.8 141.6 84 119 172 0.17

When adjusting for time post stroke and lesion size the main effect of BDNF genotype on WAB-R AQ and PNT+Naming 80 is no longer statistically significant (p = 0.11, p = 0.17, respectively).