Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 20;48(4):25–61.

Table S1. Baseline Sociodemographic, Symptomatic And Functional Characteristics Of Sample (N = 375) Of Young Adults With First Episode Psychosis (Fep) According To Follow-Up Status At 3 Years (Representativity Analyses Of Residual Sample).

LTFa AT 3 YEARS (N = 129) STILL FOLLOWED AT 3 YEARS (N = 246) P-VALUE
Sociodemographics
 Age, mean (s.d) 23,3 (3,5) 23,3 (3,6) 0,849
 Male, n (%) 94 (72,9) 193 (78,5) 0,249
 Diagnosis*, n (%)b <0,001
  - Schizophrenia spectrum 58 (45,0) 172 (69,9)
  - Affective psychosis 43 (33,3) 56 (22,8)
  - Psychosis NOS/delusional disorder/reactive psychosis 28 (21,7) 18 (7,3)
 Cluster B personality disorders, n (%) 43 (33,3) 61 (24,9) 0,090
 Immigration status, n (%) 0,469
  - Non-immigrant 72 (55,8) 131 (53,3)
  - FGIc 35 (27,1) 60 (24,4)
  - SGId 22 (17,1) 55 (22,4)
 Last completed diploma, n (%) 0,276
  - No diploma 48 (37,8) 98 (40,5)
  - High school, completed 40 (31,5) 88 (36,4)
  - Post high school diploma 39 (30,7) 56 (23,1)
 Years of education, n (%) 0,912
  - Less than 11 years 70 (55,1) 136 (56,2)
  - More than 11 years 57 (44,9) 106 (43,8)
 Employment best in lifetime, n (%) 0,068
  - Full time/Part time/Stay-at-home parent/Rehabilitation 101 (80,2) 215 (87,4)
  - None 25 (19,8) 31 (12,6)
 Income**, best in lifetime, n (%) 0,008
  - Independent income 92 (74,8) 212 (86,5)
  - Government income security/Dependent of family 31 (25,2) 33 (13,5)
 Living arrangements best in lifetime, n (%) 0,005
  - Living independently 98 (77,8) 150 (61,2)
  - Living with parents 28 (22,2) 94 (38,4)
  - Homelessness 0 (0) 1 (0,4)
 History of childhood trauma, n (%) 28 (50,9) 64 (50,0) 1,000
 Homelessness history, n (%) 16 (12,8) 46 (18,9) 0,145
 History of legal problems before admission, n (%) 35 (29,2) 58 (23,7) 0,306
 Symptomatology
 PANSSe, mean (s.d) 76,9 (13,9) 78,0 (15,3) 0,649
  - Positive symptoms 20,0 (5,1) 19,6 (6,2) 0,660
  - Negative symptoms 21,7 (5,2) 22,3 (5,9) 0,516
  - General symptoms 35,2 (6,8) 36,1 (6,8) 0,403
 CDSf, mean (s.d) 6,1 (3,9) 6,4 (3,6) 0,635
 CGI-Sg, mean (s.d) 4,8 (1,0) 4,8 (0,9) 0,638
 Substance use disorder, n (%) 67 (51,9) 127 (51,6) 1,000
  - alcohol 23 (17,8) 47 (19,1) 0,889
  - cannabis 58 (45,0) 110 (44,7) 1,000
  - cocaine 11 (8,5) 15 (6,1) 0,397
  - amphetamines 16 (12,4) 34 (13,8) 0,751
  - others 3 (2,3) 6 (2,4) 1,000
 Functioning
 GAFhbest in lifetime, mean (s.d.) 63,2 (10,3) 60,8 (11,4) 0,046
 GAF, mean (s.d.) 29,3 (9,2) 30,4 (10,1) 0,337
 SOFASi, best in lifetime, mean (s.d.) 62,7 (11,0) 61,4 (10,7) 0,252
 SOFAS, mean (s.d) 33,3 (13,2) 33,9 (12,4) 0,629
 QLSj, mean (s.d) 50,1 (21,2) 50,1 (22,4) 0,990
 Marital status, n (%) 0,040
  - Single 101 (78,3) 212 (86,2)
  - Boyfriend/Girlfriend 19 (14,7) 21 (8,5)
  - Separated/Divorced 5 (3,9) 2 (0,8)
  - Married/Common-law partner 4 (3,1) 11 (4,5)
 Studying, n (%) 0,075
  - Full-time/Part-time 29 (22,6) 41 (16,7)
  - None 99 (77,3) 205 (83,3)
 Employment***, n (%) 0,115
  - Full time/Part time/Work rehabilitation 42 (33,1) 62 (25,2)
  - None 85 (66,9) 184 (74,8)
 Income**, n (%) 0,489
  - Independent income 83 (67,5) 156 (63,7)
  - Government income security/Dependent of family 40 (32,5) 89 (36,3)
 Living arrangements****, n (%) 0,001
  - Living independently 85 (65,9) 110 (44,7)
  - Living with parents 37 (28,7) 112 (45,5)
  - Supervised living, hospital, family 1 (0,8) 10 (4,1)
  - Homelessness/other 6 (4,7) 14 (5,7)
 Service use
 Community treatment order, n (%) 9 (7,0) 52 (21,1) <0,001

aLTF: Lost to follow-up.

bDiagnosis has been revised at 3 years with all the information available.

cFGI: First generation immigrant.

dSGI: Second generation immigrant.

ePANSS: Positive and negative syndrome scale.

fCDS: Calgary depression scale.

gCGI: Clinical global impression - severity subscale.

hGAF: General assessment of functioning.

iSOFAS: Social and occupational functioning assessment scale.

jQLS: Quality of Life scale.

*Diagnosis has been revised at 3 years will all the information available.

**Work/Bank loan/Employment insurance benefits/Scholarship.

***“Full- or part-time work” included competitive work, work rehabilitation programs or sheltered work, and stay-at-home parents taking care of their own children full time.

****Living arrangements were rated according to scales adapted from Ciompi,1980: “Independent” regrouped all patients living on their own alone, with their partner and/or their children; “With parents” regrouped all patients living with any family members; “Supervised” regrouped patients living in supported housing (supervised apartment, group home, foster home, hospital