Table 3.
Experimental trends in thermal stability of the aptamer constructs in presence and absence of the L-Arm ligand
System | Motif | T m (°C)a | ΔTm (°C) | Change (reference)c |
---|---|---|---|---|
apt | n.a. | 55.2 ± 1.6* | ref* | – |
apt(ImH+) | Non | 56.4 ± 1.3 | 1.2 ± 2.0 | + T3ImH+ (*) |
f2-apt | n.a. | 53.5 ± 0.7∧ | f2-ref∧ | – |
−1.7 ± 2.0 | + double flip (*) | |||
+ L-Armb | 62.2 ± 1.7 | 8.7 ± 1.9 | + L-Arm (∧) | |
f2-apt (ImH+) | in | 64.9 ± 1.1 | 11.4 ± 1.3# | + T3ImH+ (∧) |
+ L-Arm[b] | 69.4 ± 0.8 | 4.5 ± 1.4 | + L-Arm (#) | |
15.9 ± 1.3 | +(T3ImH+ & L-Arm) (*) |
a1 μM strand concentration, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.0 The reported errors are one standard deviation as described in the materials section.
bThe L-Arm concentration used was 10 mM representing a 10 000:1 L-Arm/aptamer ratio.
c *, ∧ and # refer to the same labels introduced in column Tm in order to identify the temperature used as a reference to gauge the impact of the change mentioned.