Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 27;95(2):fiy230. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiy230

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

A representative module was obtained from (A), forest and (B), pasture components of the network for comparative analysis. The criteria used in comparing these modules were that they were most connected within their members and have high node size. Forest module (M8) is comprised of 55 nodes with average connectivity of 7.98, while the pasture module is comprised of 61 nodes with average connectivity of 10.62. The size of the nodes in each network is scaled according to their betweenness centrality values to indicate their relative importance in their networks.