Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cancer. 2018 Oct 31;144(3):595–606. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31909

Table 1:

Correlation between Nuclear PRMT5 expression and the clinico-pathologic factors of breast cancer

Variable Nucl PRMT5 low Nucl PRMT5 high P*
No. (%) No. (%)
141 (36.2) 249 (63.8)
Age (Yr) -Mean (± SD) 57.1 (±3.6) 59.7 (±11.8) 0.05
Age groups -50y 45 (31.9) 57 (22.9) 0.05
- >50y 96 (68.1) 192 (77.1)
BMI -25 81 (58.7) 153 (64.3) 0.281
- >25 57 (41.3) 85 (35.7)
T. size -2cm 65 (46.1) 155 (62.2) 0.002
- >2cm 76 (53.9) 94 (37.8)
LN invasion -No 64 (45.4) 99 (39.8) 0.28
-Yes 77 (54.6) 150 (60.2)
SBR grade -Gr 1 19 (13.5) 53 (21.3) <0.001
-Gr 2 46 (35.6) 136 (54.6)
-Gr 3 76 (53.9) 60 (24.1)
ERα status -Negative 40 (28.4) 10 (4.0) <0.001
-Positive 101 (71.6) 239 (96.0)
PR status -Negative 53 (37.6) 46 (18.5) <0.001
-Positive 88 (62.4) 203 (81.5)
Her 2 status -Negative 71 (89.9) 132 (93.0) 0.42
-Over-expressed 8 (10.1) 10 (7.0)
*

Correlation by Pearson’s Chi square test unless otherwise specified

Difference between means by Student’s T test