Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cancer. 2018 Oct 31;144(3):595–606. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31909

Table 2:

Correlation between Nuclear PRMT5 expression and the different biomarkers studied by IHC

Variable Nucl PRMT5 low
Nucl PRMT5 high
P*
No. (%) No. (%)
141 (36.2) 249 (63.8)
Nucl. pAKT -Low (50) 87 (64.9) 95 (39.7) <0.001
-High (>50) 47 (35.1) 144 (60.3)
Cytopl. pAKT --Low (100) 120 (88.9) 189 (78.8) 0.013
-High (>100) 15 (11.1) 51 (21.2)
Nucl. LKB1 -Low (=0) 77 (57.0) 110 (46.2) 0.045
-High (>0) 58 (43.0) 128 (53.8)
Cytopl. LKB1 -Low (140) 79 (58.5) 150 (62.5) 0.448
-High (>140) 56 (41.5) 90 (37.5)
P4E-BP1 -Low (50) 66 (48.9) 130 (53.7) 0.368
-High(>50) 69 (51.1) 112 (46.3)
P85-pS6K -Low (90) 94 (66.7) 174 (71.9) 0.281
-High (>90) 47 (33.3) 68 (28.1)
PS6-RP -Low (100) 105 (77.2) 178 (73.6) 0.432
-High (>100) 31 (22.8) 64 (26.4)
Menin -Low (100) 65 (50.4) 84 (38.0) 0.024
-High (>100) 64 (49.6) 137 (62.0)
Cytopl IGF1-R -Low (100) 81 (60.4) 109 (45.0) 0.004
-High (>100) 53 (39.6) 133 (55.0)
*

Correlation by Pearson’s Chi square test