Table 3:

Multivariable logistic regression for the associations between PVAT radiodensity tertiles and the presence of CAC ≥ 10 and AC ≥ 100

CAC ≥ 10 presence (n=528)			AC ≥ 100 presence (n=526)
PVAT radiodensity tertiles	OR (95% CI)	p	PVAT radiodensity tertiles	OR (95% CI)	p
Model 1		0.70	Model 1		0.05
Middle vs. Low	0.92 (0.56, 1.52)	0.76	Middle vs. Low	0.69 (0.42, 1.12)	0.13
High vs. Low	0.80 (0.48, 1.33)	0.40	High vs. Low	0.55 (0.33, 0.91)	0.02
Model 2		0.54	Model 2		0.04
Middle vs. Low	0.91 (0.54, 1.54)	0.73	Middle vs. Low	0.68 (0.41, 1.12)	0.13
High vs. Low	0.74 (0.44, 1.27)	0.28	High vs. Low	0.52 (0.31, 0.87)	0.01
Model 3		0.55	Model 3		0.17
Middle vs. Low	1.35 (0.74, 2.48)	0.33	Middle vs. Low	0.81 (0.48, 1.38)	0.44
High vs. Low	1.03 (0.56, 1.87)	0.93	High vs. Low	0.60 (0.35, 1.02)	0.06
Model 4		0.47	Model 4		0.22
Middle vs. Low	1.32 (0.69, 2.53)	0.40	Middle vs. Low	0.69 (0.38, 1.27)	0.24
High vs. Low	0.89 (0.46, 1.74)	0.74	High vs. Low	0.59 (0.31, 1.10)	0.09

PVAT, aortic perivascular adipose tissue; CAC, coronary artery calcification; AC, aortic calcification; Model 1: unadjusted; Model 2: adjusted for age, race, site, menopausal status; Model 3: model 2 + body mass index; Model 4: model 3 + log-transformed triglycerides, current smoking status, systolic blood pressure and aorta length