Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov;80(4):571–582. doi: 10.18999/nagjms.80.4.571

Table 4.

Comparison of the predictive values among conventional prognostic scores and laboratory prognostic score

No. 1 2 3 4 5 6
Predicting Model Objective Prognostic Score (OPS) Palliative Prognostic Score (PaP Score) Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI) Laboratory Prognostic Score (LPS)
Year 2010 2012 1999 2012 2017
Author Suh SY Maltoni M Morita T Maltoni M Yamada T Kawai N
Country South Korea Italy Japan Italy Japan Japan
Number of patients 185 549 150 549 892 761
Setting inpatient in hospice in hospice in hospice in palliative care unit in hospice
Median survival 26 days 22 days 27 days 22 days 25 days 24 days
30-day survival nd nd nd nd nd 42%
3-week survival nd nd 63% nd nd 57%
Score range 0–8 0–17.5 0–15.0 0–15.0 0–15.0 0–10
Mortality prediction 3 weeks 30 days 3 weeks 30 days 3 weeks 30 days
Cutoff value OPS: 3 PaP Score: 5 PPI: 6.0 PPI: 4.0 PPI: 6.0 LPS: 5
Sensitivity 75 % 92 % 75 % 85 % 71 % 85 %
Specificity 77 % 58 % 84 % 54 % 67 % 55 %
Positive Predictive Value 42 % 76 % 73 % 73 % 63 % 72 %
Negative Predictive Value 79 % 82 % 85 % 70 % 75 % 74 %

nd: not described