Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 12;120(5):2640–2648. doi: 10.1152/jn.00283.2018

Table 1.

Statistics for slope of linear fit between imposed rotation and response: implicit adaptation or explicit reaiming

Implicit Adaptation
Explicit Reaming
Mean Confidence interval Mean r value Mean Confidence interval Mean r value
Slope of linear fit −16:16°
Consistent-1 −0.192 −0.214 to −0.170 0.894 −0.028 −0.045 to −0.012 0.488
Consistent-2 −0.298 −0.365 to −0.231 0.824 −0.374 −0.508 to −0.240 0.794
Consistent-3 −0.335 −0.423 to −0.248 0.869 −0.230 −0.352 to −0.108 0.702
Consistent-7 −0.300 −0.363 to −0.237 0.789 −0.152 −0.232 to −0.071 0.651
Slope of linear fit −4:4°
Consistent-1 −0.263 −0.317 to −0.209 0.755 −0.060 −0.108 to −0.012 0.553
Consistent-2 −0.465 −0.606 to −0.325 0.708 −0.354 −0.521 to −0.188 0.632
Consistent-3 −0.491 −0.646 to −0.336 0.756 −0.181 −0.334 to −0.028 0.529
Consistent-7 −0.329 −0.444 to −0.213 0.535 −0.111 −0.247 to 0.024 0.485

Values are mean, confidence interval, and mean r value for the slope of the linear fit between imposed rotation and response. The linear equation was fit to the data of each subject for the whole range (−16:16°) and only the small rotations (−4:4°).