Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 12;120(5):2640–2648. doi: 10.1152/jn.00283.2018

Table 2.

Statistics for slope of linear fit between imposed rotation and response: implicit adaptation or explicit reaiming

Implicit Adaptation
Explicit Reaiming
Mean Confidence interval Mean r value Mean Confidence interval Mean r value
Slope of linear fit from −32:32°
Consistent-2 −0.176 −0.223 to −0.129 0.782 −0.451 −0.579 to −0.323 0.910
Consistent-7 −0.196 −0.296 to −0.096 0.750 −0.310 −0.475 to −0.145 0.692
Slope of linear fit from −16:16°
Consistent-2 −0.291 −0.364 to −0.218 0.828 −0.455 −0.600 to −0.310 0.947
Consistent-7 −0.378 −0.483 to −0.273 0.782 −0.265 −0.437 to −0.092 0.742
Slope of linear fit from −8:8°
Consistent-2 −0.358 −0.481 to −0.236 0.758 −0.467 −0.644 to −0.290 0.865
Consistent-7 −0.410 −0.519 to −0.301 0.732 −0.251 −0.381 to −0.121 0.670
Slope of linear fit from −4:4°
Consistent-2 −0.477 −0.676 to −0.278 0.889 −0.453 −0.723 to −0.183 0.791
Consistent-7 −0.454 −0.785 to −0.122 0.808 −0.234 −0.422 to −0.046 0.732

Values are mean, confidence interval, and mean r value for the slope of the linear fit between imposed rotation and response. The linear equation was fit to the data of each subject for the whole range (−32:32°), the range from experiment 1 (−16:16°), the range of small rotations that captures the 1-to-4 ratio of small to large rotations (−8:8°), and the range of small rotations used in experiment 1 (−4:4°).