Short abstract
Interpretation of laboratory investigations relies on reference intervals. Physiological changes in pregnancy may result in significant changes in normal values for many biochemical assays, and as such results may be misinterpreted as abnormal or mask a pathological state.
The aims of this review are as follows:
1. To review the major physiological changes in biochemical tests in normal pregnancy.
2. To outline where these physiological changes are important in interpreting laboratory investigations in pregnancy.
3. To document the most common causes of abnormalities in biochemical tests in pregnancy, as well as important pregnancy-specific causes.
Keywords: Endocrinology, biochemistry, pregnancy reference intervals
Several studies have documented the physiological changes that occur in many biochemical laboratory tests in normal pregnancy.1–8
There is significant variability between laboratories depending on the method of testing, the assay used and population factors. Wherever possible clinicians should use a reference interval specific to the laboratory that has performed the test.
Users and laboratories should consider how to reliably code gestational age and work towards developing validated laboratory-specific reference intervals and decision thresholds in their population.
Renal
Early in first trimester renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate each rise by approximately 60% above preconception values, resulting in a fall in serum creatinine (se Cr), urea and urate by 25%. Measures of renal function then remain steady throughout pregnancy. In the third trimester renal plasma flow declines to preconception values and se Cr trends upwards towards pre-pregnancy levels.
It is important to recognise that se Cr levels which would be in the normal interval outside of pregnancy may represent renal dysfunction during pregnancy. It is also important to anticipate a rise in se Cr from the second to the third trimester especially in women with preconception renal dysfunction. This rise in se Cr improves postpartum but not entirely to baseline.9
The pregnancy-specific variation in serum urate may have implications if part of the diagnostic strategy in PET.
No estimation formulae for eGFR have been validated in a pregnant population so should not be used.
Urinary protein and albumin excretion rise during pregnancy especially from 20 weeks’ gestation. This has commonly been attributed to the increase in GFR although the timing is not in parallel.9 Another potential cause is selective alterations in glomerular charge. The amount of proteinuria may increase significantly during pregnancy in women with preconception proteinuria, making diagnosis of superimposed preeclampsia (PET) difficult.
PET/Hemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes and Low Platelet count (HELLP) syndrome account for 60–80% of cases of acute kidney injury (AKI) during pregnancy in developed countries.10 Other important causes of AKI include placental abruption, sepsis, postpartum haemorrhage, renal obstruction, acute fatty liver of pregnancy (AFLP), haemolytic–uraemic syndrome/thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use postpartum.
In developing countries sepsis accounts for approximately 40% of cases of AKI.
Twenty-four hour urine protein estimations may be inaccurate due to under- or over-collection. Errors in timing and retention may also occur due to large volumes of urine within dilated collecting systems.11 Urine protein:Cr ratios on spot collections correlate well with 24 h urine protein estimations and the time of day of collection does not impact on accuracy.12,13
Plasma osmolality and sodium
There is a 3 l gain of water in pregnancy which contributes to significant haemodilution of many electrolytes. Water balance is controlled by thirst and the secretion of ADH, which are regulated primarily by serum osmolality. In pregnancy the osmotic threshold for ADH release and thirst stimulus is reset down,14,15 a process which has been interpreted to result from a baroreceptor stimulus from arterial underfilling overwhelming the osmostat.16 Vasopressinase is released by placental trophoblasts in concentrations proportional to placental weight, so activity is higher in the third trimester or in multiple pregnancies. Vasopressinase causes degradation of ADH and might be expected to thus cause some tempering of the effects of the reset osmostat towards the end of the pregnancy, although an increase in osmolality in the later stages of pregnancy are atypical.
Serum osmolality falls by 10 mOsm/kg early in pregnancy reaching a nadir at the end of first trimester that is maintained until the end of pregnancy. In the absence of marked hyperglycaemia or renal failure, serum sodium (Na) levels in pregnancy parallel serum osmolality. Na falls by 3–6 mmol/l.3–8 The most common cause of severe hyponatraemia in pregnancy is PET. Razavi et al.17 found hyponatraemia complicated 9.7% of pregnancies with PET. Hyponatraemia is associated with a picture of syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) release with elevated urine Na and inappropriately high urine osmolality, although SIADH implies the absence of hypervolemia so strictly cannot be diagnosed in pregnancy. Hyponatraemia is more common with earlier onset PET, where significant oedema is present, with twin pregnancies and with older women. Possible explanations include insufficient vasopressinase produced by a defective placenta, or excess ADH or oxytocin produced by placenta or myometrium due to premature contractions under the influence of ovarian steroids. Hyponatraemia with a picture of SIADH may also be seen with prolonged labour, post-caesarean section and with the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for analgesia postpartum.18–20 Severe hyponatraemia has also been reported with oxytocin infusions for induction of labour, primary polydipsia and hyperemesis gravidarum.21–24
Glucocorticoid deficiency and/or hypothyroidism related to Sheehan’s syndrome and lymphocytic hypophysitis should be excluded in women with peripartum hyponatraemia.25
Hypernatraemia is rare in pregnancy. Gestational diabetes insipidus may occur, usually in the second or third trimesters, due to excess placental vasopressinase activity.26 Diabetes insipidus may also occur with AFLP and hepatic injury with PET, as a result of reduced hepatic degradation of vasopressinase.27 Rarely diabetes insipidus may be unmasked in pregnancy in women with reduced vasopressin production due to previous neurosurgery or head trauma, or acutely in the setting of pituitary apoplexy.28
The water deprivation test is considered unsafe in pregnancy. Diagnosis of diabetes insipidus requires assessment of basal urine and plasma osmolality, and response to desmopressin.29
Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone (RAA) axis
Pregnancy is a state of hyperreninaemic hyperaldosteronism. Vascular underfilling seen by the kidneys results in stimulation of the RAA system. Renin is also produced by the ovaries and uteroplacental unit. Oestrogens stimulate the synthesis of angiotensinogen which result in proportionally higher levels of aldosterone compared with renin. Progesterone is an antagonist of aldosterone, and thus the effects of increased aldosterone are tempered during pregnancy.
Plasma aldosterone concentrations increase approximately 3–8-fold compared with non-pregnant values, plateauing in third trimester. Similarly 24 h urine aldosterone excretion at term is approximately eight-fold higher than pre-pregnancy.30 Plasma renin activity (PRA) increases approximately four-fold by eight weeks’ gestation and seven-fold at term. As a result aldosterone:renin ratios (ARRs) may fall in pregnancy affecting the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism.31
The hormonal changes in the RAA result in false negative testing during pregnancy in 40% of women with known primary aldosteronism.32 Elevated ARR together with PRA less than 54 mU/l is strongly suggestive of primary aldosteronism in pregnancy.33 Dynamic tests to confirm primary aldosteronism are generally not performed during pregnancy because of concerns regarding salt and volume loading, though values for well pregnant women following saline infusion have been published.34 Until pregnancy-specific reference intervals for direct renin concentration are available, PRA is the preferred method in determination of ARR, to minimise false positives.35
Betamethasone suppresses maternal aldosterone by approximately 50% for two days after administration.36
PRA is not a useful guide regarding mineralocorticoid replacement with Addison’s disease or congenital adrenal hyperplasia in pregnancy.37
Labetalol does not affect PRA.38
Potassium
Despite the large increase in aldosterone during pregnancy, potassium excretion is tempered by oestrogen and progesterone increasing sodium reabsorption in the proximal nephron and progesterone acting as a mineralocorticoid antagonist in the distal nephron.39 There continues to be conjecture concerning the mechanism for fine control of potassium homeostasis during pregnancy.
Serum potassium (K) is approximately 0.3 mmol/l lower in the third trimester compared with pre-pregnancy.3–4
There is a net retention of potassium during pregnancy, but it is unclear whether this is related to renal retention or gastrointestinal retention. Two studies described a fall in 24 h urine K excretion in pregnancy,39,40 but this finding has contrasted with others reporting no change in urinary potassium excretion between the follicular phase and nine weeks’ gestation41 or when comparing second and third trimesters.10,42
The potential decrement in urine K excretion in pregnancy must be taken into account in differentiating whether hypokalaemia is due to gastrointestinal or renal losses of potassium.
The most common cause of hypokalaemia in pregnancy is vomiting with morning sickness/hyperemesis.43 Gitelman syndrome is the second most commonly reported cause of hypokalaemia in the literature and may be unmasked in pregnancy.44 Diagnosis of Gitelman and Bartter syndromes is based on genetic testing, as normal pregnancy is associated with hyperreninaemic hyperaldosteronism, and differentiation between the two disorders based on urinary calcium excretion may be affected by the physiologic rise in urine calcium in pregnancy. Unusual causes of hypokalaemia in pregnancy include pica/geophagia, excessive ingestion of caffeine or carbonated beverages, hyperventilation, renal tubular acidosis and following administration of betamethasone.45–48 A mineralocorticoid receptor mutation resulting in hypokalaemia from agonist action of progesterone and cortisol metabolites may be unmasked in pregnancy.49,50 Hypokalaemia with primary aldosteronism may resolve in pregnancy due to the anti-mineralocorticoid effect of progesterone. Primary aldosteronism should be considered where there is hypertension and hypokalaemia worsening postpartum when progesterone levels drop.51
Importantly, there is an increased predilection for rhabdomyolysis and paralysis with hypokalaemia in pregnancy.52–54
Hyperkalaemia is rare in pregnancy. Pregnancy-specific causes include case reports of hyperkalaemia due to labetalol therapy, following magnesium sulphate infusion, and type 4 renal tubular acidosis related to diabetic kidney disease which may worsen through pregnancy.55–58
Liver enzymes
Pregnancy is associated with mild falls in alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) and bilirubin. This may be related to lower intake of hepatotoxic drugs and alcohol in pregnancy.59 Pregnancy is also associated with a fall in serum albumin beyond what would be expected from the increase in circulating volume, and despite a 50% increase in albumin synthesis in the liver, and it has been hypothesised that there might be albumin catabolism to improve delivery of amino acids to the fetus.3 Some authors have reported that lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) may rise from in first trimester, normal values in third trimester being up to double values pre-pregnancy.4 Other authors report no change in LDH.59 Levels of cholic acid and deoxycholic acid are unchanged during pregnancy60,61 though levels of chenodeoxycholic acid increase significantly postpartum.61
Levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) rise due to production of the placental isoenzyme, as well as a significant increase in bone isoenzyme in third trimester. Prothrombin time falls progressively from the second trimester such that values are approximately 10–20% lower than preconception values in the third trimester.62 This may be important when considering abnormal hepatic synthetic function with disorders such as AFLP. Serum amylase activity is similar in non-pregnant women and pregnant women in all trimesters of pregnancy. Serum lipase activity is significantly lower in the first trimester but not the later trimesters compared with non-pregnant women.63
Important causes of acutely elevated transaminases in pregnancy include PET (HELLP syndrome), drug reactions, AFLP, viral and autoimmune hepatitis, sepsis and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. A LDH:AST ratio of greater than 22 may be helpful in distinguishing thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura from HELLP syndrome.64
Raised serum bile acids are the best indicator of intrahepatic cholestasis, although transaminases are elevated in about half of cases, GGT in about a third, and bilirubin may be modestly increased in up to 30%.65
An acute rise in ALP may signify placental damage or infarction.66 Elevated placental ALP may also be seen with antiphospholipid syndrome.67 If required, distinction of placental ALP from liver or bone isoenzyme may be made by serum ALP electrophoresis.
Possible physiological changes in LDH may be relevant where LDH is being used as a tumour marker.
The most common cause of hypoalbuminaemia in pregnancy is PET.68 Albumin levels are on average 15% lower in PET than in healthy pregnancy.69
Hyperemesis gravidarum has been reported to be associated with significantly elevated levels of lipase and amylase in the absence of clinical pancreatitis.70
Gas exchange/arterial blood gas
An increase in minute ventilation driven by progesterone increases oxygenation despite the 20% increase in oxygen consumption in pregnancy, reduces carbon dioxide and results in a respiratory alkalosis which is fully compensated by renal bicarbonate excretion.
Bicarbonate levels are 25% lower in pregnancy.2
There is a difference between sitting and supine arterial oxygen concentration in the latter half of pregnancy, and by term supine PaO2 is 7 mmHg lower than sitting PaO2.71 The mechanism for this is not clear.
Even mild reductions in PaO2 are likely to signify underlying pathology. Similarly a PaCO2 in the normal non-pregnant range may represent respiratory fatigue in a pregnant woman with an acute exacerbation of asthma.
The peripartum period is often the first time women have pulse oximetry performed. Clinicians need to be aware of the rare possibility of variant haemoglobins where there are unexpectedly low pulse oximetry saturations with normal PaO2 on arterial blood analysis.72
Diabetic ketoacidosis may occur more rapidly and at lower blood glucose levels in pregnancy related to the reduced serum bicarbonate and thus reduced buffering capacity.73
Starvation ketoacidosis may occur after periods of fasting less than 16 hours in the second and third trimester due to insulin resistance and reduced serum bicarbonate.74
Calcium/bone
A slight fall in unadjusted calcium, magnesium (Mg) and phosphate occurs in pregnancy. Corrected calcium results may be falsely elevated due to changes in albumin. Ionised calcium, which does not change in pregnancy, should be measured instead. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels fall by approximately 50% in the second and third trimester as levels of parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP) rise, but there remains a relationship between PTH and 25-vitamin D in pregnancy.75 PTHrP is the major hormonal mediator of calcium homeostasis in pregnancy, is produced mainly by the placenta and peaks in the third trimester,76,77 and mimics the effect of PTH on kidneys and bone. 25 hydroxy-vitamin D levels remain unchanged, while levels of 1,25 (OH)2 vitamin D rise due to the effect of PTHrP and oestrogen stimulating 1-alpha hydroxylase.
Urine calcium excretion increases up to 2–3-fold during pregnancy commencing at 12 weeks’ gestation due to increased calcium absorption and increased GFR.
Serum Mg declines such that levels in third trimester are 30% lower than preconception.78–82 Similarly ionised and red blood cell Mg, and intracellular free Mg in brain and muscle are lower in pregnancy than in non-pregnant controls when measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.83,84
Urine Mg excretion rises by approximately 25% during pregnancy.85,86
Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is the most common cause of hypercalcaemia in pregnancy,87 and surgical intervention in the second trimester has been advocated with serum calcium levels above 2.75–2.85 mmol/l.76 Other important causes include milk-alkali syndrome (triad of hypercalcaemia, alkalosis and AKI), familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia (FHH) and PTHrP-mediated hypercalcaemia. The clinical symptoms of PTH-related hypercalcaemia may be masked by other physiological changes in pregnancy, and the diagnosis might be missed by falsely normal total calcium levels in the absence of measurement of ionised calcium levels, with physiologically lowered PTH levels.
The rise in urine calcium may cause difficulty in differentiating FHH and PHPT and thus risk unnecessary neck exploration. More than 100 mutations in the calcium-sensing receptor have been identified; however, a mutation is only detected in two-thirds of cases of FHH.88 Measuring calcium in relatives may be a more rapid and reliable way of differentiating between FHH and PHPT in pregnancy.89 In addition, the physiologic hypercalciuria of pregnancy may result in difficulty in establishing the diagnosis of Gitelman syndrome without genetic testing. Hypercalciuria of pregnancy increases the risk of renal calculi. Falling urine calcium as early as first trimester may predict the later development of PET.90,91 The decrease in urine calcium is due to a fall in GFR rather than increased tubular reabsorption.
Hypocalciuria may also be seen in pregnant women with vitamin D deficiency.
Hypocalcaemia commonly occurs with magnesium sulphate infusion. Hypocalcaemia may also occur with vitamin D deficiency and hypomagnesaemia.
Important causes of hypomagnesaemia in pregnancy include poorly-controlled diabetes mellitus, Gitelman/Bartter syndromes, congenital tubular defects, alcohol, PET and previous jejuno-ileal bypass surgery.92 A very rare cause of severe hypomagnesaemia and diabetes mellitus is mutations in the hepatocyte nuclear factor 1β or 4β genes.93
Cardiac markers
Levels of troponin I (TnI) are unchanged in healthy pregnancy and are not affected by labour, anaesthesia, or caesarean section.94–99 Most studies have shown that brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels remain unchanged compared with preconception levels in normotensive women throughout pregnancy.100–103 One longitudinal study of 29 healthy pregnant women showed no significant differences between BNP levels throughout trimesters and in the postpartum period, though pregnant BNP levels were approximately twice as high as in non-pregnant controls.100 In healthy women BNP levels rose approximately 2–3-fold in the first 48 h postpartum returning to baseline 6–12 weeks’ postpartum. The rise in BNP correlated with an increase in left atrial and left ventricular volume on echocardiography; however, cardiac output was not increased. It is postulated this may relate to uteroplacental transfusion, release of vena caval obstruction and mobilisation of extravascular fluid. Mild elevation of BNP postpartum may therefore represent a physiologic change and not evidence of cardiac pathology. Chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension and PET are all associated with elevated BNP.102–104 In individuals with PET, elevation of BNP may persist for 3–6 months’ postpartum.105
Studies as to whether PET is associated with a rise in cTnI have revealed inconsistent results.106
Five studies found PET was associated with significantly higher values for TnI than uncomplicated pregnancy.107–110
Four authors found no difference in levels of TnI in normotensive pregnancy and PET.111–114 Bozkurt et al.111 found that while TnI levels were not increased with PET, levels were higher in women with eclampsia. Two of these studies specifically investigated women with severe PET finding no significant difference in TnI with normotensive women.112,113
Two studies showed normal troponin T (TnT) levels in healthy pregnancy.110,115
No data have been published regarding levels of high sensitivity troponin in pregnancy, but studies examining normal reference intervals would be useful.
Women of child-bearing age are at low risk of atheromatous coronary artery disease, although ischaemic heart disease is becoming increasingly common in pregnancy. In pregnant women with elevated troponin but otherwise inconclusive evidence for myocardial ischaemia, other diagnoses such as pulmonary embolism, obstructive sleep apnoea, coronary artery dissection, illicit drug use (cocaine, amphetamines and heroin) and false elevation of troponin due to heterophile antibodies should be considered.
Thyroid
Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is structurally similar to thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and has a direct stimulating effect on the TSH receptor. hCG levels peak at the end of first trimester resulting in a transient increase in free thyroxine (fT4) and a fall in TSH levels. Hyperemesis gravidarum is often associated with high hCG levels that can cause transient and self-resolving hyperthyroidism.116
Thyroxine-binding globulin increases 2–3 times compared with pre-pregnancy by 20 weeks’ gestation, as a result of increased hepatic production induced by oestrogen and reduced clearance.117 As a result the dose of thyroxine should be increased by approximately 30% in women on thyroxine supplementation early in pregnancy.
Maternal iodine requirements increase in pregnancy due to transfer to the feto-placental unit and increased urine excretion.
There are large differences in reference intervals for thyroid function between different populations of pregnant women due to variations in assays as well as population-specific factors such as ethnicity, maternal iodine status and body mass index. It is recommended that institutions calculate their own trimester- and method-specific reference intervals rather than relying on fixed universal cut-off concentrations. Treatment targets may be distinct from reference intervals, and a large body of literature continues to debate treatment targets for thyroid function parameters during pregnancy.118–120
Some suggest for those women on long-term thyroxine supplementation aiming for TSH in lower half of non-pregnant reference range, particularly from weeks 4 to 11 when the fetal brain is developing.
Anti-thyroid peroxidase and/or anti-thyroglobulin antibodies are found in 15–20% of Australian women at 10–13 weeks’ gestation and influence the TSH treatment target.121 TSH levels in antibody-positive pregnant women tend to be significantly higher and they should not be included in establishing reference interval intervals.122 Antibody levels tend to fall during pregnancy.
Common causes of elevated TSH in pregnancy include failure to increase thyroxine supplementation in hypothyroid women, poor medication adherence, interference with absorption due to concomitant ingestion of calcium- or iron-containing foods or supplements, coexistent coeliac disease (present in 3% of women with autoimmune thyroiditis), iodine deficiency or excess, women with nephrotic range proteinuria (due to urinary loss of thyroxine).123–127 In women presenting with newly diagnosed hypothyroidism within 12 months of delivery of a previous baby, the possibility of undiagnosed persistent postpartum thyroiditis should be considered.
The most common cause of low TSH in first trimester of pregnancy is due to hCG stimulation. Ten to twenty per cent of normal women have transiently low or undetectable TSH levels as a result, usually with normal fT4 and fT3, though these may be mildly elevated. hCG-mediated thyrotoxicosis may be differentiated from Graves’ disease by the absence of TSH receptor antibodies, absence of increased colour flow Doppler on ultrasound and by measurement of erythrocyte zinc levels.128–130 Severe thyrotoxicosis may occur with gestational trophoblastic disease.
Graves’ disease is the second most common cause of thyrotoxicosis in pregnancy.
Ingestion of large quantities of biotin may cause a picture suggestive of Graves’ disease with elevated fT4, elevated fT3, elevated TSH receptor antibodies and low TSH due to interference with immunoassays.131
Maternal contact with fetal tissue epitopes during amniocentesis may trigger thyroid hormone antibodies and cause false elevation in fT4 and fT3.132
Heterophile antibodies commonly complicate interpretation of thyroid function tests and should be suspected if there is a discrepancy between thyroid function and clinical status. There are no known pregnancy-specific heterophile antibodies.
Hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis
Total plasma cortisol, 24 hour urine free cortisol (24 h UFC), nocturnal salivary cortisol (NSC) and cortisol-binding globulin (CBG) levels progressively rise three-fold during pregnancy.
Placental production of corticotropin-releasing hormone and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) results in a three-fold rise in these hormones, which decrease within 2 hours of delivery.133
Plasma free cortisol increases 1.6-fold by the third trimester.134 During the final weeks of pregnancy there is a substantial fall in CBG with a corresponding further rise in plasma free cortisol.
The diurnal rhythm of ACTH and cortisol is preserved.8
The HPA axis sensitivity to exogenous glucocorticoids is lost, thus the dexamethasone suppression test is not useful for the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome (CS).135 A 24 h UFC more than three times the upper end of the normal non-pregnant interval is strongly suggestive of CS. An elevated NSC is also useful in the diagnosis of CS.136 ACTH levels cannot be used to differentiate between pituitary and adrenal causes of CS, as ACTH levels are not suppressed in half of adrenal CS, whereas some pregnant women with pituitary Cushing’s disease have been reported to have suppressed ACTH.137–138
A random morning serum cortisol measured by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry of less than 300 nmol/l in first trimester, less than 450 nmol/l in second trimester and less than 600 nmol/l in third trimester should raise a clinical suspicion of adrenal insufficiency (AI).134,139 Trimester-specific values have been proposed for use with synacthen stimulation tests for diagnosis of AI (700, 800, 900 nmol/l, respectively, but adjustment to local assays is advised); however, stimulated salivary free cortisol values may be a more consistent measure of synacthen-stimulated adrenal function than serum cortisol.139 Metyrapone may be used in pregnancy; however, there are no established values for the diagnosis of HPA axis insufficiency.
The aetiology of CS is significantly different in the pregnant compared with the non-pregnant population.140 Approximately 30% of cases of CS reported in pregnancy have been due to Cushing’s disease, 42% due to adrenal adenoma, 14% due to adrenal carcinoma, 10% due to pregnancy-induced CS as a result of aberrant LH/hCG receptor expression and 4% due to ectopic ACTH syndrome.
The most common cause of HPA axis insufficiency in pregnancy is following the use of betamethasone, where suppression of maternal cortisol may be prolonged.141 Uncommon causes of HPA axis insufficiency include lymphocytic hypophysitis, Sheehan syndrome and the use of exogenous glucocorticoids including metered aerosols and skin lightening creams containing highly potent corticosteroids.
Primary AI in pregnancy may occur with bilateral adrenal haemorrhage with antiphospholipid syndrome.142
Growth hormone (GH)/insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1)
The main source of GH in first trimester is from the maternal pituitary.143 Placental GH becomes the dominant source of GH from 15 weeks’ gestation, increasing exponentially until 37 weeks’ gestation, with pituitary GH dropping to undetectable levels. Most assays do not distinguish between pituitary and placental GH. These normal changes limit the usefulness of regular monitoring of levels during pregnancy.
Placental GH does not suppress after a glucose load so the oral glucose tolerance test is difficult to interpret.144
IGF-1 has a modest fall in the first trimester, increasing during the second half of pregnancy peaking at two times the upper end of the normal non-pregnant reference interval at 37 weeks’ gestation.145
In pregnant patients with acromegaly, IGF-1 levels usually fall compared with preconception levels, possibly due to oestrogen-induced increases in GH-binding protein and a state of GH resistance, or related to pregnancy-specific assay interference.146
Prolactin
Prolactin increases approximately 10-fold in first trimester and may be greater than 20-fold of the preconception levels by term. There is therefore no value in monitoring prolactin levels in pregnancy except where doing so to monitor medication adherence in pregnant women receiving dopamine agonists for macroprolactinomas.
Glycaemic control
In non-diabetic pregnant women haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels fall in the second trimester and rise in the third trimester.8 Some advocate for the use of HbA1c in screening for impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes in the first trimester. HbA1c is significantly higher in women with iron deficiency, and thus may not be useful as an accurate measure of glycaemic control during pregnancy.147 Fructosamine levels reflect glycaemic control in the preceding 1–3 weeks. Fructosamine levels fall progressively during pregnancy due to the dilutional effect on plasma proteins. Fructosamine is associated with larger intra-individual variability than HbA1c and may be disadvantageous for detecting significant change. Fructosamine levels are lower in the setting of increased protein metabolism (e.g. proteinuria, hyperthyroidism) and are also affected by substances with reducing ability such as bilirubin and ascorbic acid.148 Glycated albumin (GA) reflects glycaemic control in the previous 2–3 weeks and more accurately reflects postprandial glucose than HbA1c. GA levels fall in the second and third trimester.147 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) levels reflect glycaemic control in the previous 24 hours. 1,5-AG levels steadily decrease from 9 weeks’ gestation in normal pregnancy because of the reduced renal threshold for glycosuria, and therefore are not an appropriate indicator of diabetic control in pregnancy.149 Of these above measures of glycaemic control HbA1c is the only one that has been standardised.
GA is a superior predictor of perinatal complications to HbA1c.150
Pregnancy is a state of insulin resistance, accelerated starvation and reduced buffering capacity due to respiratory alkalosis, especially in the second half of pregnancy.73 Starvation ketoacidosis may occur after brief periods of fasting (greater than 16 hours) even in pregnant women with normal glucose tolerance.151 Ketoacidosis may also be precipitated by the administration of glucocorticoids for fetal lung maturation.152
International consensus has not been reached regarding the recommended method and criteria for the diagnosis of GDM. A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies and control arms of randomised trials found graded linear associations between maternal glucose concentrations and adverse perinatal outcomes with no clear evidence of a threshold effect.153 Adoption of the new International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria may result in a considerable increase in the incidence of GDM with an accompanying increase in health costs and requirement for resources. It is unclear as to whether this results in consistent improvements in pregnancy or neonatal outcomes.154,155 A recent Cochrane Library review concluded large randomised trials are required to establish the best strategy for diagnosis of GDM.156 Research investigating the cost-effectiveness of varying glucose thresholds for the diagnosis of GDM on perinatal outcomes is required.
Recommendations for glycaemic targets and timing of glycaemic monitoring in gestational diabetes mellitus vary among different medical societies.157 This lack of uniformity exists because of a lack of evidence on glucose data and pregnancy outcome.158 No randomised trial has defined optimal treatment targets. Recommendations for fasting blood glucose targets range between less than 5.0 and 5.3 mmol/l, 1 hour post-meal glucose between less than 7.0 and 7.8 mmol/l, and 2 hour post-meal between less than 6.4 and 6.7 mmol/l. A meta-analysis demonstrated fasting glucose less than 5 mmol/l in third trimester was associated with a reduction in the risk of macrosomia, neonatal hypoglycaemia and maternal PET.159 A randomised controlled trial comparing pre-prandial and postprandial testing revealed reduced adverse pregnancy outcomes with decision making based upon 1 hour postprandial target glucose of less than 7.8 mmol/l compared with pre-prandial targets of 3.3–5.8 mmol/l.160 No study to date has evaluated whether monitoring blood glucose 1 or 2 hours post-meal is superior. Tight glucose control may increase the risk of a small for gestational age (SGA) infant. When mean blood glucose was less than 4.8 mmol/l throughout pregnancy there was a 20% incidence of SGA, compared with 11% in a control group.161
Glycaemic targets for women with type 1 diabetes mellitus need to be personalised based upon the individual risk of hypoglycaemia and degree of hypoglycaemic awareness.
Lipids
Total and LDL cholesterol levels double, and triglycerides rise three-fold in pregnancy due to increased hepatic production and reduced activity of lipoprotein lipase. No reference ranges have been established so routine testing should not be performed in pregnancy. Women with underlying hypertriglyceridaemia may develop a severe rise in triglycerides during pregnancy which may lead to chylomicronaemia and pancreatitis.162,163
Lipid levels fall rapidly postpartum and plateau after three months.164 In women with GDM or PET lipids remain elevated throughout 12 postpartum months.164
Cholesterol and triglycerides fall more rapidly in women who breastfeed than those who do not establish lactation.165
Sex hormones
Oestradiol levels progressively rise during pregnancy reaching 100-fold of pre-pregnancy values in third trimester. Similarly there is a progressive marked rise in levels of progesterone and 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP).166 The levels of testosterone rise to be approximately five times pre-pregnancy values at term.167 Sex-hormone-binding globulin levels increase approximately five-fold during pregnancy.168
Follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinising hormone are low and similar to the follicular phase.
In pregnant women with congenital adrenal hyperplasia, testosterone, androstenedione and 17-OHP should be measured every 2–3 weeks adjusting the glucocorticoid dose to maintain androgen concentrations within normal intervals for the relevant stage of pregnancy.169–170
Iron metabolism
Serum ferritin drops progressively from the first trimester and reaches a nadir by the third trimester of approximately 50%, independent of iron balance.171 Serum ferritin is still the best biomarker for iron status during pregnancy, but a lower cut-off level for iron deficiency should be used.171 Serum transferrin receptor correlates well with the severity of anaemia in pregnancy,172 but the assay is not widely available. Serum iron levels remain relatively stable. Serum transferrin increases by approximately 10%. Transferrin saturation falls slightly. Transferrin iron-binding capacity increases progressively from first trimester.173
Trace elements
Serum ceruloplasmin levels and with it total serum copper progressively rise during pregnancy from the sixth week of gestation such that third trimester serum copper levels are approximately double that of pre-pregnancy levels.174–176 This may be important in the diagnosis and monitoring of pregnant women with Wilson’s disease. Serum copper levels are significantly lower in the setting of PET than in healthy pregnant women.177
Zinc binds albumin, and with the reduction in albumin in pregnancy, serum total zinc levels are approximately 15% lower in third trimester than in first trimester.178 Zinc levels are significantly lower in PET than in healthy pregnant controls. Zinc deficiency in some, but not all studies has been associated with intrapartum haemorrhage, congenital anomalies, intrauterine growth restriction and impaired immunological and neurobehavioural development in the fetus.179–182
Other
Total B12 falls in pregnancy due to reduction in holohaptocorrin. Active B12 (holotranscobalamin) remains unchanged and should be used as guide to B12 deficiency in pregnancy.183
Plasma metanephrines are unchanged during pregnancy. Plasma normetadrenaline levels may be elevated up to two-fold in individuals with obstructive sleep apnoea, as well as with antidepressant medications.184–186 Levels should be assessed prior to commencement of interfering medications in hypertension in pregnancy.
Serum hCG levels rise significantly in the setting of significant renal dysfunction and cannot be used to diagnose pregnancy.187
The physiologic rise in alpha feto-protein during pregnancy is relevant where these are being used for screening for hepatocellular carcinoma or germ cell tumours.188
Similarly Ca-125 may be elevated in the first trimester and postpartum, but it still has utility as a screening tool for ovarian malignancy in the second or third trimesters.189,190
α-1 antitrypsin levels rise steadily throughout pregnancy such that third trimester values are approximately 2.5 times those preconception.191
Most authors state C-reactive protein remains unchanged during pregnancy. Levels, however, rise up to four-fold in the first two days postpartum following normal vaginal delivery,192 and higher following caesarean section and vacuum extraction.193
Fecal calprotectin levels remain unchanged in normal pregnancy, though rise in parallel with disease activity in women with inflammatory bowel disease. C-reactive protein does not rise with disease activity.194
Conclusion
In conclusion changes in physiology result in many significant alterations in reference intervals for biochemical tests in pregnancy. Awareness of these changes and pregnancy-unique disorders causing laboratory abnormalities is critical in the management of pregnant women. Laboratory-specific reference intervals are desirable for optimal pregnancy care.
Acknowledgements
The accuracy of the results is based on published literature.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Guarantor
ST.
Contributorship
AM initiated the project, ST and AM wrote the body of the paper.
References
- 1.Gronowski A. Human pregnancy. An overview In: Gronowski A. (ed.) Current clinical pathology: handbook of clinical laboratory testing during pregnancy. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2004, pp.1–13. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Soma-Pillay P, Nelson-Piercy C, Tolppanen H, et al. Physiological changes in pregnancy. Cardiovasc J Afr 2016; 27: 89–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Klajnbard A, Szecsi PB, Colov NP, et al. Laboratory reference intervals during pregnancy, delivery and the early postpartum period. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010; 48: 237–248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Abbassi-Ghanavati M, Greer LG, Cunningham FG. Pregnancy and laboratory studies: a reference table for clinicians. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 1326–1331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tran H. Biochemical tests in pregnancy. Aust Prescr 2005; 28: 98–101. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Larsson A, Palm M, Hansson LO, et al. Reference values for clinical chemistry tests during normal pregnancy. BJOG 2008; 115: 874–881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.van BEJ, Steegers EA, Jongsma HW, et al. Haematological and biochemical profile of uncomplicated pregnancy in nulliparous women; a longitudinal study. Neth J Med 1995; 46: 73–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ramsay M. Normal values In: David K, James PJS, Carl PW, et al. (eds) High risk pregnancy: management options. 4th ed Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier, 2011, pp.1385–1408. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cheung KL, Lafayette RA. Renal physiology of pregnancy. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2013; 20: 209–214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sammartino C, Jarvis E, Burke J, et al. Acute kidney disease in pregnancy. Am J Kidney Dis 2016; 67: A21–A24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lindheimer MD, Kanter D. Interpreting abnormal proteinuria in pregnancy: the need for a more pathophysiological approach. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115: 365–375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hossain N, Khan N, Shah N, et al. Spot urine protein-creatinine ratio and 24-h urine protein excretion: diagnostic accuracy in women with pre-eclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens 2014; 4: 87–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Waugh J, Hooper R, Lamb E, et al. Spot protein-creatinine ratio and spot albumin-creatinine ratio in the assessment of pre-eclampsia: a diagnostic accuracy study with decision-analytic model-based economic evaluation and acceptability analysis. Health Technol Assess 2017; 21: 1–90. Oct [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Davison JM, Lindheimer MD. Volume homeostasis and osmoregulation in human pregnancy. Bailliere Clin Endocrinol Metab 1989; 3: 451–472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Franx A, Steegers EA, de Boo T, et al. Sodium-blood pressure interrelationship in pregnancy. J Hum Hypertens 1999; 13: 159–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tkachenko O, Shchekochikhin D, Schrier RW. Hormones and hemodynamics in pregnancy. Int J Endocrinol Metab 2014; 12: e14098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Razavi AS, Chasen ST, Gyawali R, et al. Hyponatremia associated with preeclampsia. J Perinat Med 2016; 45: 467–470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Roche C, Ragot C, Moalic JL, et al. Ibuprofen can induce syndrome of inappropriate diuresis in healthy young patients. Case Rep Med 2013; 2013: 167267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lurie S, Feinstein M, Mamet Y. Symptomatic hyponatremia following cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2002; 11: 138–139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Moen V, Brudin L, Rundgren M, et al. Hyponatremia complicating labour – rare or unrecognised? A prospective observational study. BJOG 2009; 116: 552–561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bergum D, Lonnee H, Hakli TF. Oxytocin infusion: acute hyponatraemia, seizures and coma. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009; 53: 826–827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Graham K, Palmer J. Severe hyponatraemia as a result of primary polydipsia in labour. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 44: 586–587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gayathri KB, Bhargav PR. Hyperemesis gravidarum is a syndrome of metabolic and endocrine disturbances: a case description. Ind J Clin Biochem 2014; 29: 390–392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jarraya A, Elleuch S, Zouari J, et al. [Hyperemesis gravidarum with severe electrolyte disorders: report of a case]. Pan Afr Med J 2015; 20: 264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lust K, McIntyre HD, Morton A. Sheehan’s syndrome – acute presentation with hyponatraemia and headache. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 41: 348–351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chanson P, Salenave S. Diabetes insipidus and pregnancy. Ann Endocrinol 2016; 77: 135–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kennedy S, Hall PM, Seymour AE, et al. Transient diabetes insipidus and acute fatty liver of pregnancy. BJOG 1994; 101: 387–391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Marques P, Gunawardana K, Grossman A. Transient diabetes insipidus in pregnancy. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep 2015; 2015: 150078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tack LJ, T’Sjoen G, Lapauw B. Exacerbation of pre-existing diabetes insipidus during pregnancy, mechanisms and management. Acta Clin Belg 2017; 72: 213–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Martin JD, Mills IH. Aldosterone excretion in normal and toxaemic pregnancies. Br Med J 1956; 2: 571–573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kim EH, Lim JH, Kim YH, et al. The relationship between aldosterone to renin ratio and RI value of the uterine artery in the preeclamptic patient vs. normal pregnancy. Yonsei Med J 2008; 49: 138–143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Morton A. Primary aldosteronism and pregnancy. Pregnancy Hypertens 2015; 5: 259–262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Malha L, August P. Secondary hypertension in pregnancy. Curr Hypertens Rep 2015; 17: 53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bentley-Lewis R, Graves SW, Seely EW. The renin-aldosterone response to stimulation and suppression during normal pregnancy. Hypertens Pregnancy 2005; 24: 1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ahmed AH, Gordon RD, Taylor PJ, et al. Are women more at risk of false-positive primary aldosteronism screening and unnecessary suppression testing than men? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96: E340–E346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kessel JM, Cale JM, Verbrick E, et al. Antenatal betamethasone depresses maternal and fetal aldosterone levels. Reprod Sci 2009; 16: 94–104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Quinkler M, Oelkers W, Remde H, et al. Mineralocorticoid substitution and monitoring in primary adrenal insufficiency. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015; 29: 17–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hauger-Klevene JH. Renin levels and cardiovascular morbidity: a prospective study of the effect of beta-adrenergic blocking drugs. Curr Med Res Opin 1981; 7: 443–451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lindheimer MD, Richardson DA, Ehrlich EN, et al. Potassium homeostasis in pregnancy. J Reprod Med 1987; 32: 517–522. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gupta P. and Nath S. . Electrolyte balance in normal pregnancy. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 1964; 8: 217–220. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sealey JE, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Rubattu S, et al. Estradiol- and progesterone-related increases in the renin-aldosterone system: studies during ovarian stimulation and early pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1994; 79: 258–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Brown MA, Sinosich MJ, Saunders DM, et al. Potassium regulation and progesterone-aldosterone interrelationships in human pregnancy: a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155: 349–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lassey SC, Robinson JN. Rhabdomyolysis after hyperemesis gravidarum. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128: 195–196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Berry MR, Robinson C, Karet Frankl FE. Unexpected clinical sequelae of Gitelman syndrome: hypertension in adulthood is common and females have higher potassium requirements. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2013; 28: 1533–1542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.McKenna D. Myopathy, hypokalaemia and pica (geophagia) in pregnancy. Ulster Med J 2006; 75: 159–160. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Matsunami K, Imai A, Tamaya T. Hypokalemia in a pregnant woman with long-term heavy cola consumption. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1994; 44: 283–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Appel CC, Myles TD. Caffeine-induced hypokalemic paralysis in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97: 805–807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Teagarden CM, Picardo CW. Betamethasone-induced hypokalemic periodic paralysis in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 433–435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Geller DS, Farhi A, Pinkerton N, et al. Activating mineralocorticoid receptor mutation in hypertension exacerbated by pregnancy. Science 2000; 289: 119–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rafestin-Oblin ME, Souque A, Bocchi B, et al. The severe form of hypertension caused by the activating S810L mutation in the mineralocorticoid receptor is cortisone related. Endocrinology 2003; 144: 528–533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Nezu M, Miura Y, Noshiro T, et al. Primary aldosteronism as a cause of severe postpartum hypertension in two women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 745–746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Muthukrishnan J, Harikumar K, Jha R, et al. Pregnancy predisposes to rhabdomyolysis due to hypokalemia. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2010; 21: 1127–1128. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Scolari Childress KM, Myles T. Baking soda pica associated with rhabdomyolysis and cardiomyopathy in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 495–497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Nigam P, Morton A. Paraparesis secondary to hypokalaemia with hyporeninemic hypoaldosteronism during pregnancy: a diagnostic dilemma. Obstet Med 2013; 6: 88–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Morton A. Severe hyperkalaemia peripartum with magnesium sulphate. Obstet Med 2012; 5: 86–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Iglesias MH, Giesbrecht EM, von Dadelszen P, et al. Postpartum hyperkalemia associated with magnesium sulfate. Hypertens Pregnancy 2011; 30: 481–484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Spital A, Greenwell R. Severe hyperkalemia during magnesium sulfate therapy in two pregnant drug abusers. South Med J 1991; 84: 919–921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Jakes AD, Baynes K, Nelson-Piercy C. Renal tubular acidosis type 4 in pregnancy . BMJ Case Reports 2016; 2016. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2016-21479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Cattozzo G, Calonaci A, Albeni C, et al. Reference values for alanine aminotransferase, alpha-amylase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyltransferase and lactate dehydrogenase measured according to the IFCC standardization during uncomplicated pregnancy. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013; 51: e239–e241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Lee RH, Ouzounian JG, Goodwin TM, et al. Bile acid concentration reference ranges in a pregnant Latina population. Am J Perinatol 2013; 30: 389–393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Rosing U, Kallner A. Serum cholic and chenodeoxycholic acids during pregnancy and puerperium in normal and pre-eclamptic women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1986; 65: 11–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Gong JM, Shen Y, He YX. Reference intervals of routine coagulation assays during the pregnancy and puerperium period. J Clin Lab Anal 2016; 30: 912–917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Karsenti D, Bacq Y, Brechot JF, et al. Serum amylase and lipase activities in normal pregnancy: a prospective case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 697–699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Keiser SD, Boyd KW, Rehberg JF, et al. A high LDH to AST ratio helps to differentiate pregnancy-associated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) from HELLP syndrome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25: 1059–1063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Walker IA, Nelson-Piercy C, Williamson C. Role of bile acid measurement in pregnancy. Ann Clin Biochem 2002; 39: 105–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ranganath L, Taylor W, John L, et al. Biochemical diagnosis of placental infarction/damage: acutely rising alkaline phosphatase. Ann Clin Biochem 2008; 45: 335–338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Delluc C, Costedoat-Chalumeau N, Saadoun D, et al. Elevation of alkaline phosphatase in a pregnant patient with antiphospholipid syndrome: HELLP syndrome or not? Rheumatology 2008; 47: 554–555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Gojnic M, Petkovic S, Papic M, et al. Plasma albumin level as an indicator of severity of preeclampsia. Clin Exp Obst Gynecol 2004; 31: 209–210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Dai DM, Cao J, Yang HM, et al. Hematocrit and plasma albumin levels difference may be a potential biomarker to discriminate preeclampsia and eclampsia in patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Clin Chim Acta 2017; 464: 218–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Johnson A, Cluskey B, Hooshvar N, et al. Significantly elevated serum lipase in pregnancy with nausea and vomiting: acute pancreatitis or hyperemesis gravidarum? Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2015; 2015: 359239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Spiropoulos K, Prodromaki E, Tsapanos V. Effect of body position on PaO2 and PaCO2 during pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2004; 58: 22–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Verhovsek M, Henderson MP, Cox G, et al. Unexpectedly low pulse oximetry measurements associated with variant hemoglobins: a systematic review. Am J Hematol 2010; 85: 882–885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Sibai BM, Viteri OA. Diabetic ketoacidosis in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 167–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Spanou L, Dalakleidi K, Zarkogianni K, et al. Ketonemia and ketonuria in gestational diabetes mellitus. Hormones 2015; 14: 644–650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Seely EW, Brown EM, DeMaggio DM, et al. A prospective study of calciotropic hormones in pregnancy and post partum: reciprocal changes in serum intact parathyroid hormone and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176: 2147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Diaz-Soto G, Linglart A, Senat MV, et al. Primary hyperparathyroidism in pregnancy. Endocrine 2013; 44: 591–597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Salles JP. Bone metabolism during pregnancy. Ann Endocrinol 2016; 77: 163–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Sheldon WL, Aspillaga MO, Smith PA, et al. The effects of oral iron supplementation on zinc and magnesium levels during pregnancy. BJOG 1985; 92: 892–898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Kisters K. [Disorders of magnesium balance]. Internist 1998; 39: 815–819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Cruikshank DP, Pitkin RM, Reynolds WA, et al. Effects of magnesium sulfate treatment on perinatal calcium metabolism. I. Maternal and fetal responses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 134: 243–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Dawson EB, Clark RR, McGanity WJ. Plasma vitamins and trace metal changes during teen-age pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1969; 104: 953–958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Lim MK. Experience with serum magnesium estimations. Med J Aust 1969; 1: 1075–1077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Resnick LM, Barbagallo M, Bardicef M, et al. Cellular-free magnesium depletion in brain and muscle of normal and preeclamptic pregnancy: a nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic study. Hypertension 2004; 44: 322–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Lim P, Jacob E, Dong S, et al. Values for tissue magnesium as a guide in detecting magnesium deficiency. J Clin Pathol 1969; 22: 417–421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Yamasaki M. [Magnesium and pregnancy]. Clin Calcium 2012; 22: 1205–1210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Salinas M, Martinez ME, Catalan P, et al. [Serum levels and urinary excretion of magnesium in pregnancy. Effect of milk intake]. Arch Latinoam Nutr 1987; 37: 444–453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Rey E, Jacob CE, Koolian M, et al. Hypercalcemia in pregnancy – a multifaceted challenge: case reports and literature review. Clin Case Rep 2016; 4: 1001–1008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Christensen SE, Nissen PH, Vestergaard P, et al. Familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia. A review. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2011; 18: 359–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Ghaznavi SA, Saad NM, Donovan LE. The biochemical profile of familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia and primary hyperparathyroidism during pregnancy and lactation: two case reports and review of the literature. Case Rep Endocrinol 2016; 2016: 2725486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.McMaster KM, Kaunitz AM, Burbano de Lara P, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of hypocalciuria in pre-eclampsia. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2017; 138: 3–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Pal A, Roy D, Adhikary S, et al. A prospective study for the prediction of preeclampsia with urinary calcium level. J Obstet Gynecol India 2012; 62: 312–316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Bera S, Siuli RA, Gupta S, et al. Study of serum electrolytes in pregnancy induced hypertension. J Indian Med Assoc 2011; 109: 546–548. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.van der Made CI, Hoorn EJ, de la Faille R, et al. Hypomagnesemia as first clinical manifestation of ADTKD-HNF1B: a case series and literature review. Am J Nephrol 2015; 42: 85–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Afshani N, Moustaqim-Barrette A, Biccard BM, et al. Utility of B-type natriuretic peptides in preeclampsia: a systematic review. Int J Obstet Anesth 2013; 22: 96–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Shivvers SA, Wians FH, Jr, Keffer JH, et al. Maternal cardiac troponin I levels during normal labor and delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Koscica KL, Bebbington M, Bernstein PS. Are maternal serum troponin I levels affected by vaginal or cesarean delivery? Am J Perinatol 2004; 21: 31–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Bodor GS, Porterfield D, Voss EM, et al. Cardiac troponin-I is not expressed in fetal and healthy or diseased adult human skeletal muscle tissue. Clin Chem 1995; 41: 1710–1715. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Poh CL, Lee CH. Acute myocardial infarction in pregnant women. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2010; 39: 247–253. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Shade GH, Jr, Ross G, Bever FN, et al. Troponin I in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in pregnancy, labor, and post partum. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 1719–1720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Hameed AB, Chan K, Ghamsary M, et al. Longitudinal changes in the B-type natriuretic peptide levels in normal pregnancy and postpartum. Clin Cardiol 2009; 32: E60–E62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Burlingame JM, Yamasato K, Ahn HJ, et al. B-type natriuretic peptide and echocardiography reflect volume changes during pregnancy. J Perinat Med 2017; 45: 577–583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Yoshimura T, Yoshimura M, Yasue H, et al. Plasma concentration of atrial natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide during normal human pregnancy and the postpartum period. J Endocrinol 1994; 140: 393–397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Cabo Fustaret MC, Escobar AM, Illia R, et al. PP113. NT-Pro-BNP: a predictor of adverse maternal outcomes in hypertensive gestational syndromes? Pregnancy Hypertens 2012; 2: 301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Resnik JL, Hong C, Resnik R, et al. Evaluation of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels in normal and preeclamptic women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 450–454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Katja J, Anna-Karin W, Anders L, et al. PP015. Plasma levels and placental expression of BNP/NT-proBNP in early and late onset preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens 2013; 3: 73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Pergialiotis V, Prodromidou A, Frountzas M, et al. Maternal cardiac troponin levels in pre-eclampsia: a systematic review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016; 29: 3386–3390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Fleming SM, O’Gorman T, Finn J, et al. Cardiac troponin I in pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension. BJOG 2000; 107: 1417–1420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Atalay C, Erden G, Turhan T, et al. The effect of magnesium sulfate treatment on serum cardiac troponin I levels in preeclamptic women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84: 617–621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Yang X, Wang H, Wang Z, et al. Alteration and significance of serum cardiac troponin I and cystatin C in preeclampsia. Clin Chim Acta 2006; 374: 168–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Pasupathi P, Manivannan U, Manivannan P, et al. Cardiac troponins and oxidative stress markers in non-pregnant, pregnant and preeclampsia women. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 2010; 36: 4–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Bozkurt M, Yumru AE, Sahin L, et al. Troponin I and D-Dimer levels in preeclampsia and eclampsia: prospective study. Clin Exp Obst Gynecol 2015; 42: 26–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Atis A, Aydin Y, Basol E, et al. Troponin I and homocysteine levels in mild and severe preeclampsia. Clin Exp Obst Gynecol 2010; 37: 21–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Aydin C, Baloglu A, Cetinkaya B, et al. Cardiac troponin levels in pregnant women with severe pre-eclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 29: 621–623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Joyal D, Leya F, Koh M, et al. Troponin I levels in patients with preeclampsia. Am J Med 2007; 120: 819.e13–819.e14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Adamcová M, et al. Cardiac troponin T in pregnant women having intravenous tocolytic therapy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1999; 262: 121–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Hershman JM. Physiological and pathological aspects of the effect of human chorionic gonadotropin on the thyroid. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004; 18: 249–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Korevaar TI, Chaker L, Medici M, et al. Maternal total T4 during the first half of pregnancy: physiologic aspects and the risk of adverse outcomes in comparison with free T4. Clin Endocrinol 2016; 85: 757–763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Garber JR, Cobin RH, Gharib H, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for hypothyroidism in adults: cosponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American Thyroid Association. Endocr Pract 2012; 18: 988–1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Rajput R, Singh B, Goel V, et al. Trimester-specific reference interval for thyroid hormones during pregnancy at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Haryana, India. Indian J Endocr Metab 2016; 20: 810–815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Yoshioka W, Amino N, Ide A, et al. Thyroxine treatment may be useful for subclinical hypothyroidism in patients with female infertility. Endocr J 2015; 62: 87–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.McElduff A, Morris J. Thyroid function tests and thyroid autoantibodies in an unselected population of women undergoing first trimester screening for aneuploidy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 48: 478–480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Gilbert RM, Hadlow NC, Walsh JP, et al. Assessment of thyroid function during pregnancy: first-trimester (weeks 9 00– 13) reference intervals derived from Western Australian women. Med J Aust 2008; 189: 250–253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Mehrdad M, Mansour-Ghanaei F, Mohammadi F, et al. Frequency of celiac disease in patients with hypothyroidism. J Thyroid Res 2012; 2012: 201538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Collins D, Wilcox R, Nathan M, et al. Celiac disease and hypothyroidism. Am J Med 2012; 125: 278–282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Pearce EN, Lazarus JH, Moreno-Reyes R, et al. Consequences of iodine deficiency and excess in pregnant women: an overview of current knowns and unknowns. Am J Clin Nutr 2016; 104: 918S–923S. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Biondi B, Wartofsky L. Treatment with thyroid hormone. Endocr Rev 2014; 35: 433–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Halma C. Thyroid function in patients with proteinuria. Neth J Med 2009; 67: 153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Sayama N, Yoshida K, Mori K, et al. Measurement of red blood cell zinc concentration with Zn-test kit: discrimination between hyperthyroid Graves’ disease and transient thyrotoxicosis. Endocr J 1998; 45: 767–772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Yoshida K. Effects of thyroid hormone on erythrocyte carbonic anhydrase-I and zinc concentrations in vivo and in vitro: clinical usefulness of carbonic anhydrase-I and zinc concentrations in erythrocytes. Tohoku J Exp Med 1996; 178: 345–356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Swaminathan R, Chin RK, Lao TT, et al. Thyroid function in hyperemesis gravidarum. Acta Endocrinol 1989; 120: 155–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Barbesino G. Misdiagnosis of Graves’ disease with apparent severe hyperthyroidism in a patient taking biotin megadoses. Thyroid 2016; 26: 860–863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Teti C, Nazzari E, Galletti MR, et al. Unexpected elevated free thyroid hormones in pregnancy. Thyroid 2016; 26: 1640–1644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Mastorakos G, Ilias I. Maternal and fetal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axes during pregnancy and postpartum. Ann NY Acad Sci 2003; 997: 136–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Jung C, Ho JT, Torpy DJ, et al. A longitudinal study of plasma and urinary cortisol in pregnancy and postpartum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96: 1533–1540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Odagiri E, Ishiwatari N, Abe Y, et al. Hypercortisolism and the resistance to dexamethasone suppression during gestation. Endocrinol Jpn 1988; 35: 685–690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Lopes LM, Francisco RP, Galletta MA, et al. Determination of nighttime salivary cortisol during pregnancy: comparison with values in non-pregnancy and Cushing’s disease. Pituitary 2016; 19: 30–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Lindsay JR, Jonklaas J, Oldfield EH, et al. Cushing’s syndrome during pregnancy: personal experience and review of the literature. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005; 90: 3077–3083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Arnaldi G, Angeli A, Atkinson AB, et al. Diagnosis and complications of Cushing’s syndrome: a consensus statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003; 88: 5593–5602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Lebbe M, Arlt W. What is the best diagnostic and therapeutic management strategy for an Addison patient during pregnancy? Clin Endocrinol 2013; 78: 497–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Jarvis E, Morton A. Adrenal cortical carcinoma mimicking early severe preeclampsia. Obstet Med 2014; 7: 45–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.McKenna DS, Wittber GM, Nagaraja HN, et al. The effects of repeat doses of antenatal corticosteroids on maternal adrenal function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 669–673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Espinosa G, Santos E, Cervera R, et al. Adrenal involvement in the antiphospholipid syndrome: clinical and immunologic characteristics of 86 patients. Medicine 2003; 82: 106–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Assal A, Malcolm J, Lochnan H, et al. Preconception counselling for women with acromegaly: More questions than answers. Obstet Med 2016; 9: 9–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Cheng V, Faiman C, Kennedy L, et al. Pregnancy and acromegaly: a review. Pituitary 2012; 15: 59–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Clapp JF, Schmidt S, Paranjape A, et al. Maternal insulin-like growth factor-I levels (IGF-I) reflect placental mass and neonatal fat mass. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 730–736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Dias ML, Vieira JG, Abucham J. Detecting and solving the interference of pregnancy serum, in a GH immunometric assay. Growth Horm IGF Res 2013; 23: 13–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Hiramatsu Y, Shimizu I, Omori Y, et al. Determination of reference intervals of glycated albumin and hemoglobin A1c in healthy pregnant Japanese women and analysis of their time courses and influencing factors during pregnancy. Endocr J 2012; 59: 145–151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Hartland AJ, Smith JM, Clark PM, et al. Establishing trimester and ethnic group-related reference ranges for fructosamine and HbA1c in non-diabetic pregnant women. Ann Clin Biochem 1999; 36: 235–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Tetsuo M, Hamada T, Yoshimatsu K, et al. Serum levels of 1,5-anhydro-D-glucitol during the normal and diabetic pregnancy and puerperium. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1990; 69: 479–485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Hashimoto K, Koga M. Indicators of glycemic control in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus and pregnant women with diabetes mellitus. WJD 2015; 6: 1045–1056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Menon A, Morton A. Case of ketoacidosis in pregnancy. Emerg Med Australas 2015; 27: 373–374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Bernstein IM, Catalano PM. Ketoacidosis in pregnancy associated with the parenteral administration of terbutaline and betamethasone. A case report. J Reprod Med 1990; 35: 818–820. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Farrar D, Simmonds M, Bryant M, et al. Hyperglycaemia and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2016; 354: i4694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Ellenberg A, Sarvilinna N, Gissler M, et al. New guidelines for screening, diagnosing, and treating gestational diabetes – evaluation of maternal and neonatal outcomes in Finland from 2006 to 2012. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2017; 96: 372–381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Huhn EA, Massaro N, Streckeisen S, et al. Fourfold increase in prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus after adoption of the new International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria. J Perinat Med 2017; 45: 359–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Farrar D, Duley L, Dowswell T, et al. Different strategies for diagnosing gestational diabetes to improve maternal and infant health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 8: CD007122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Popova P, Casorino K, Grineva EN, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis and treatment goals: measurement and measures. Minerva Endocrinol 2016; 41: 421–432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Martis R, Brown J, Alsweiler J, et al. Different intensities of glycaemic control for women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 4: CD011624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Metzger BE, Buchanan TA, Coustan DR, et al. Summary and recommendations of the fifth international workshop-conference on gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: S251–S260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.de Veciana M, Major CA, Morgan MA, et al. Postprandial versus preprandial blood glucose monitoring in women with gestational diabetes mellitus requiring insulin therapy. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1237–1241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Langer O, Levy J, Brustman L, et al. Glycemic control in gestational diabetes mellitus – how tight is tight enough: small for gestational age versus large for gestational age? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 646–653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Jeon HR, Kim SY, Cho YJ, et al. Hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis in pregnancy causing maternal death. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2016; 59: 148–151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Glueck CJ, Christopher C, Mishkel MA, et al. Pancreatitis, familial hypertriglyceridemia, and pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 136: 755–761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Novack V, et al. Postpartum levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides in women with and without gestational diabetes mellitus and preeclampsia. AJOG 2008; 199: S167. [Google Scholar]
- 165.Qureshi IA, et al. Hyperlipidaemia during normal pregnancy, parturition and lactation. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1999; 28: 217–221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.O’Leary P, Boyne P, Flett P, et al. Longitudinal assessment of changes in reproductive hormones during normal pregnancy. Clin Chem 1991; 37: 667–672. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Makieva S, Saunders PT, Norman JE. Androgens in pregnancy: roles in parturition. Hum Reprod Update 2014; 20: 542–559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Wilke TJ, Utley DJ. Total testosterone, free-androgen index, calculated free testosterone, and free testosterone by analog RIA compared in hirsute women and in otherwise-normal women with altered binding of sex-hormone-binding globulin. Clin Chem 1987; 33: 1372–1375. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Lo JC, Grumbach MM. Pregnancy outcomes in women with congenital virilizing adrenal hyperplasia. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2001; 30: 207–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Witchel SF. Management of CAH during pregnancy: optimizing outcomes. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2012; 19: 489–496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.MKilman N. Iron and pregnancy – a delicate balance. Ann Hematol 2006; 85: 559–565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Sharma JB, Bumma SD, Saxena R, et al. Cross sectional, comparative study of serum erythropoietin, transferrin receptor, ferritin levels and other haematological indices in normal pregnancies and iron deficiency anemia during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 203: 99–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Kurhade GA, Khanorkar SV, Puranik BM, et al. Serum level of iron and transferrin in pregnancy and postpartum period. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 1994; 38: 34–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Malik A, Khawaja A, Sheikh L. Wilson’s disease in pregnancy: case series and review of literature. BMC Res Notes 2013; 6: 421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Speich M. [Copper in the normal and diabetic pregnancy and in the perinatal period]. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet 1990; 85: 34–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Vir SC, Love AH, Thompson W. Serum and hair concentrations of copper during pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr 1981; 34: 2382–2388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Keshavarz P, Nobakht MGBF, Mirhafez SR, et al. Alterations in lipid profile, zinc and copper levels and superoxide dismutase activities in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. Am J Med Sci 2017; 353: 552–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Liu X, Zhang Y, Piao J, et al. Reference values of 14 serum trace elements for pregnant Chinese women: a cross-sectional study in the china nutrition and health survey 2010– 2012. Nutrients 2017; 9: 309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Ma Y, Shen X, Zhang D. The relationship between serum zinc level and preeclampsia: a meta-analysis. Nutrients 2015; 7: 7806–7820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.He L, Lang L, Li Y, et al. Comparison of serum zinc, calcium, and magnesium concentrations in women with pregnancy-induced hypertension and healthy pregnant women: a meta-analysis. Hypertens Pregnancy 2016; 35: 202–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.McMichael AJ, Dreosti IE, Gibson GT, et al. A prospective study of serial maternal serum zinc levels and pregnancy outcome. Early Hum Dev 1982; 7: 59–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Black RE. Micronutrients in pregnancy. Br J Nutr 2001; 85: S193–S197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Morkbak AL, Hvas AM, Milman N, et al. Holotranscobalamin remains unchanged during pregnancy. Longitudinal changes of cobalamins and their binding proteins during pregnancy and postpartum. Haematologica 2007; 92: 1711–1712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Lenders JW. Pheochromocytoma and pregnancy: a deceptive connection. Eur J Endocrinol 2012; 166: 143–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Hoy LJ, Emery M, Wedzicha JA, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea presenting as pseudopheochromocytoma: a case report. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004; 89: 2033–2038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Harding JL, Yeh MW, Robinson BG, et al. Potential pitfalls in the diagnosis of phaeochromocytoma. Med J Aust 2005; 182: 637–640. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Buckner CL, Wilson L, Papadea CN. An unusual cause of elevated serum total beta hCG. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2007; 37: 186–191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Lau WY, Leung WT, Ho S, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma during pregnancy and its comparison with other pregnancy-associated malignancies. Cancer 1995; 75: 2669–2676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Spitzer M, Kaushal N, Benjamin F. Maternal CA-125 levels in pregnancy and the puerperium. J Reprod Med 1998; 43: 387–392. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Goh W, Bohrer J, Zalud I. Management of the adnexal mass in pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2014; 26: 49–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Haram K, Augensen K, Elsayed S. Serum protein pattern in normal pregnancy with special reference to acute-phase reactants. BJOG 1983; 90: 139–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Romem Y, Artal R. C-reactive protein in pregnancy and in the postpartum period. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151: 380–383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Kaapa P, Koistinen E. Maternal and neonatal C-reactive protein after interventions during delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1993; 72: 543–546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Julsgaard M, Hvas CL, Gearry RB, et al. Fecal calprotectin is not affected by pregnancy: clinical implications for the management of pregnant patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2017; 23: 1240–1246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
