Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 28;10(12):455–480. doi: 10.1177/1756287218814100

Table 1.

First-line randomized clinical trials testing chemotherapy in mUC.

Author Experimental arm Control arm Phase n ORR (%) PFS (months) OS
(months)
Cisplatin-based treatment Cisplatin-based combinations Logothetis and colleagues19 M-VAC CISCA 3 110 65 versus 46 NR 11.1 versus 8.3
Loehrer and colleagues18; Saxman and colleagues20 M-VAC Cisplatin 3 269 39 versus 12 10 versus 4.3 12.5 versus 8.2
Von der Maase and colleagues5,35 GC M-VAC 3 405 49 versus 46
(NS)
7.4 versus 8.3
(NS)
14 versus 15.2
(NS)
Sternberg and colleagues24,25 DD-M-VAC M-VAC 3 263 64 versus 50 9.5 versus 8.1 15.1 versus 14.9
Bamias and colleagues38 DD-GC DD-M-VAC 3 130 65 versus 60 (NS) 7.8 versus 8.5
(NS)
18 versus 19
(NS)
Bellmunt and colleagues37 PGC GC 3 626 55 versus 44 8.3 versus 7.6 (NS) 15.8 versus 12.7 (NS)
Carboplatin versus cisplatin Petrioli and colleagues41 MVECa MVEC 2 57 41 versus 71 4.5 versus 8** 9.5 versus 13
Bellmunt and colleagues39 M-CAVI M-VAC 2 47 39 versus 52 (NS) NR 9 versus 16*
Dreicer and colleagues42 Carbo-paclitaxel M-VAC 3 85 28 versus 36 (NS) 5.2 versus 8.7 13.8 versus 15.4 (NS)
Dogliotti and colleagues40 GCa GC 2 110 40 versus 49.1 7.7 versus 8.3 9.8 versus 12.8
Unfit patients De Santis and colleagues56 GCa M-CAVI 2/3 238 41 versus 30 (NS)*** 5.8 versus 4.2 p (NS) 9.3 versus 8.1 (NS)
De Santis (2015)61 Vinflunine-gem Vinflunine-carbo 2 69 53 versus 43 (NS) 5.9 versus 6.1 (NS) 14 versus 12.8 (NS)

carbo, carboplatin; CISCA, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin; DD, dose-dense; GC, gemcitabine and cisplatin; GCa, gemcitabine and carboplatin; gem, gemcitabine; mUC, metastatic urothelial cancer; M-CAVI, methotrexate, carboplatin, and vinblastine; M-VAC, methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin; MVECa, methotrexate, vinblastine, epirubicin, and carboplatin; MVEC, methotrexate, vinblastine, epirubicin, and cisplatin; NR, not reported; NS, difference not statistically significant; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; PGC, paclitaxel plus GC.

*

based on median cancer-specific survival, OS not reported.

**

based on response duration, PFS not reported; ***ORR difference was statistically significant based on confirmed responses (36 versus 21%, p 0.01).