Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 13;8(4 Suppl):49S–58S. doi: 10.1177/2192568218799058

Table 1.

Summary of the 50 Studies Included in Pooled Data for Presenting Features of Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis.

Demographics Presentation Lesion Location
First Author, Year Paper Type Patients (n) Men (n) Mean Age (Years) Time to Diagnosis (Days) Back Pain Neurological Findings Cervical Thoracic Lumbar
Aagaard, 2013 Retrospective review 100 37 60 32 25 26 65
Asamoto, 2005 Retrospective review 21 13 66 19 12 5 7 11
Ascione 2017 Retrospective review 30 13 64 28 30 5 0 2 20
Bernard, 2015 Randomized controlled trial 351 242 61 337 57 52 96 246
Bettini, 2009 Retrospective review 56 21 48 34 56 18 3 8 48
Butler, 2006 Retrospective review 48 24 59 47 14 4 11 30
Bydone, 2014 Retrospective review 118 57 67 61 35 40 43
Cebrian, 2012 Retrospective review 108 49 68 97 27 4 38 66
Chung, 2011 Retrospective review 20 13 60 20 14 0 8 12
Citak, 2014 Retrospective review 183 99 63 80 14 66 97
D’Agostino, 2010 Prospective series 81 51 58 55.4 79 12 10 59 12
D’Aliberti, 2012 Retrospective review 40 29 56 39 16 13 18 9
Dennis, 2017 Retrospective 84 49 62 68 19 29 79 156
Eysel, 1997 Retrospective review 55 28 52
Ha, 2007 Retrospective review 24 14 23 7 0 0 24
Hadjipavlou, 2000 Retrospective review 101 76 46 40 10 33 55
Heyde, 2006 Retrospective review 20 11 60 84 9
Homagk, 2016 Retrospective review 270 153 64 101 30 103 149
Hopf, 1998 Retrospective review 72 39 52 0 40 49
Karadimas, 2008 Retrospective review 163 101 56 13 72 88
Kaya, 2014 Retrospective review 107 64 53 97 18 7 14 90
Kehrer, 2015 Retrospective review 298 182 66 33 38 95 203
Klockner, 2003 Retrospective review 71 38 54 18 0 33 39
Krodel, 1991 Retrospective review 24 50
Legrand, 2001 Retrospective review 110 67 61 40 18 3 23 69
Lemaignen, 2017 Retrospective review 394 267 63 40 369 130 71 137 281
Lin CP, 2012 Retrospective review 48 19 67 144 48 28 0 16 38
Lin TY, 2014 Retrospective review 45 25 62 0 9 36
Lin Y, 2015 Retrospective review 22 13 55 22 8 0 0 22
Lu, 2015 Retrospective review 28 13 60 6 0 2 28
Mann, 2004 Prospective series 24 14 63 24 13 4 10 10
Nasto, 2014 Retrospective review 27 18 60 33 0 5 22
Noh, 2017 Retrospective review 31 27 68 18 3 8 20
Pee, 2008 Retrospective review 60 36 59 58 16 0 0 60
Rath, 1996 Retrospective review 43 24 60 46 35 0 19 24
Shinkel, 2003 Retrospective review 32 18 61 32 17 21 19 35
Schomacher, 2014 Retrospective review 37 24 62 37 6 6 25
Shetty, 2016 Retrospective review 27 19 48 6
Shiban, 2014 Retrospective review 113 78 104 40
Shousha, 2012 Retrospective review 30 19 65 24 12 30 0 0
Sobottke, 2009 Retrospective review 20 14 43 23 3 2 6 12
Srinivasan, 2014 Retrospective review 48 29 56
Suess, 2007 Retrospective review 24 15 65 9 24 7 3 14 7
Tsai, 2017 Retrospective review 90 61 61
Valancius, 2013 Retrospective review 196 106 52.5 177 47 9 42 125
Vcelak, 2014 Retrospective review 31 20 61 9 6 25
Viale, 2009 Prospective series 48 36 60 9 6 9 29
Wirtz, 2000 Retrospective review 59 29 61 90 46
Yaldz, 2015 Retrospective review 39 19 47 105 37 18 0 15 24
Ziu, 2014 Retrospective review 102 87 45 102 26 9 24 59