Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 17.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Nov 5;2(12):1982–1992. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0680-6

Table 2.

VNTR cluster rates of the indigenous sublineages in six distinct populations.

Sublineages Individual County Sitea All Sites Odds Ratio P value
GX HLJ HN SC SD SH
L2.3 41%
(24/58)
66%
(95/145)
57%
(70/123)
23%
(15/65)
61%
(76/125)
58%
(132/226)
56%
(412/742)
1 -
L2.2 31%
(15/49)
42%
(5/12)
40%
(17/42)
16%
(7/45)
25%
(6/24)
36%
(29/80)
31%
(79/252)
0.366
[0.267–0.500]
<0.0001
L4.2 13%
(2/16)
0%
(0/0)
22%
(2/9)
24%
(4/17)
0%
(0/5)
36%
(8/22)
23%
(16/69)
0.242
[0.127–0.440]
<0.0001
L4.4 20%
(4/20)
60%
(6/10)
0%
(0/3)
0%
(0/23)
27%
(4/15)
0%
(0/17)
16%
(14/88)
0.152
[0.078–0.277]
<0.0001
L4.5 40%
(6/15)
13%
(2/15)
0%
(0/8)
23%
(10/44)
26%
(5/19)
8%
(2/25)
20%
(25/126)
0.198
[0.120–0.319]
<0.0001
a

The six county sites refer to the population sites, from which the MTBC isolates were collected through population-based approach from 2009 to 2010. GX refers to Guangxi, HLJ refers to Heilongjiang, HN refers to Henan, SC refers to Sichuan, SD refers to Shandong and SH refers to Shanghai.