Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 21;18(12):8003–8010. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04146

Table 1. Comparison of Different Single-Molecule Plasmon Resonance Sensing Methods.

method time resolution (ms) waiting time max no. of events specificity ref
photothermal microscopy 100 tens to hundreds of seconds (100 nM protein) <10 (streptavidin) yes (10)
dark-field spectroscopy 24 50 s (average, 1.25 μg/mL fibronectin) ∼10–20 (fibronectin) yes (9)
single-nanorod scattering 6 ∼1–100 s (25–2.5 nM antibody) ∼10b (antibody) yes (11)
double-nanohole plasmonic trapping <1 seconds to hoursa not determined (no binding site consumed) no (5) and (6)
plasmonic nanopores <200 μs ∼100 ms (1 μg/mL dsDNA) >500 (no binding site consumed) no this work
a

Waiting times in these devices vary widely depending on slight differences in sample preparation and poorly understood surface repulsion.6

b

On each nanorod.