Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 17;13(12):e0208553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208553

Table 5. Estimated regression coefficients for the relationship between urinary phthalate metabolites and delayed responses of peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR).

Phthalate metabolites Lagged day Estimate (95% confidence interval)
Basic modela Model with outdoor environmentb
MEHHP LAG0 -7.18 (-15.74, 1.39) -8.40 (-17.39, 0.60)
LAG1 -9.18 (-18.17, -0.18)* -12.17 (-21.74, -2.59)*
LAG2 -4.30 (-11.87, 3.28) -5.00 (-12.70, 2.69)
MEOHP LAG0 -7.28 (-16.25, 1.69) -7.50 (-16.89, 1.90)
LAG1 -9.42 (-19.39, 0.54) -10.80 (-21.32, -0.29)*
LAG2 -3.86 (-11.99, 4.26) -2.74 (-11.04, 5.56)
MnBP LAG0 -5.28 (-13.31, 2.75) -7.42 (-15.87, 1.04)
LAG1 -10.50 (-18.92, -2.07)* -13.65 (-22.24, -5.07)*
LAG2 -3.67 (-10.48, 3.13) -5.47 (-12.23, 1.30)

All results were quantified according to natural log-transformed concentrations of urinary phthalate metabolites

*statistically significant

aresults from basic LME model controlling for age, sex, body mass index, urinary cotinine, and the use of controller medication

bresults from LME model with outdoor environments as additional confounders; all effects were quantified per natural log-transformed concentrations of urinary phthalate metabolites; MEHHP: mono-(2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate; MEOHP: mono-(2-ethyl- 5-oxohexyl) phthalate; and MnBP: mono-n-butyl phthalate.