Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 17;8:126. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0472-9

Table 2.

Effects of humidification strategy according to oxygen flow rate (non-inferiority analyses) at H6–H8 and H24 (per protocol analysis)

Oxygen flows Results presentation HO group comfort score NHO group comfort score Absolute difference between NHO group mean score and HO group mean score
[90% CI]
Relative difference between NHO group mean score and HO group mean score
[90% CI]
Interpretation
≤4 L/min
H6–H8
Mean ± SDa 26.1 ± 19.4
20% NI margin =+5.2
27.9 ± 22.2 + 1.8 [− 2.0; + 5.5] + 6.9 [− 7.7; + 21.1] Non-conclusive
Median [IQR] 21 [10.8; 37.5] 22 [11; 38.5]
>4 L/min
H6–H8
Mean ± SDa 29.3 ± 22.1
20% NI margin = + 5.9
33.9 ± 24.2 + 4.6 [− 1.6; + 10.8] + 15.7 [− 5.5; + 36.9] Non-conclusive
Median [IQR] 22.5 [17.8; 36.5] 25 [18.5; 45]
≤4 L/min
H24
Mean ± SDa 29.6 ± 19.7
20% NI margin = + 5.9
24.8 ± 21.0 − 4.8 [− 9.1; − 0.5] − 16.2 [− 30.7; − 1.7] Non-inferiority
Median [IQR] 25.5 [13.5; 42.8] 21 [12; 34]
>4 L/min
H24
Mean ± SDa 23.8 ± 16.6
20% NI margin = + 4.8
36.4 ± 19.5 + 12.6 [+ 4.9; + 20.4] + 52.9 [+ 20.6; + 85.7] Non-conclusive
Median [IQR] 21 [12; 34] 33 [18.5; 43.5]

HO humidified oxygen, NHO non-humidified oxygen, CI confidence interval

aFor non-inferiority analysis