Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 15;12(3):426–431. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2018.11.015

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Comparison of the NGS and ddPCR ctDNA analysis. (A) Linear regression from the comparison of NGS and ddPCR VAFs (R2 = 0.9867). (B) Bland–Altman plot of the differences (NGS (VAF) - ddPCR (VAF)).