Table 1.
Variables | No. of patients (%) | p value of sTILs |
---|---|---|
Total number of patients | 143 (100) | – |
Age (years) | ||
< 50 | 64 (44.8) | 0.574 |
≥ 50 | 79 (55.2) | |
Tumor size (cm) | ||
≤ 2 | 16 (11.2) | 0.824 |
2–5 | 96 (67.1) | |
> 5 | 31 (21.7) | |
Histological gradea | ||
2 | 65 (45.5) | 0.402 |
3 | 78 (54.5) | |
Ki-67 index (%)b | ||
≤ 10 | 9 (6.3) | 0.166 |
10–30 | 47 (32.9) | |
> 30 | 87 (60.8) | |
Nodal status | ||
Negative | 57 (39.9) | <0.001 |
Positive | 86 (60.1) | |
Lympho-vascular invasion | ||
Negative | 109 (76.2) | 0.009 |
Positive | 34 (23.8) | |
MP gradingc | ||
1 | 7 (4.9) | 0.002 |
2 | 16 (11.2) | |
3 | 10 (7.0) | |
4 | 18 (12.6) | |
5 | 92 (64.3) | |
Pathological response | ||
pCR | 86 (60.1) | < 0.001 |
Non-pCR | 57 (39.9) |
HER2 Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, sTILs tumor-Infiltrating lymphocytes, pCR pathological complete response
aThe histological grade of tumor was evaluated in pre-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) core needle biopsy specimens using the Nottingham grading system, with 3 being the worst score
bFraction of Ki-67-positive tumor cells
cMiller–Payne grading system; a histopathological classification system used to categorize tumor response to treatment relative to tumor cellularity in the pre-treatment section, with grade 1 indicating no reduction in overall cellularity and grade 5 indicating no invasive carcinoma