Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr;17(2):108–113. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.17-2-108

Table 3.

Concordance between criteria in the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)

A – Case-control study: 1999 WHO versus 2015 NICE
1999 WHO∗ 2015 NICE∗ Discordant? n(%) Median HbA1c, mmol/mol Proportion with HbA1c≥42 mmol/mol
Normal Normal No 233 (44.6) 30 1.7%
Normal GDM Yes 42 (8.1) 36 16.7%
GDM Normal Yes 0 - -
GDM GDM No 247 (47.3) 37 22.1%
B – Case-control study: 1999 WHO versus 2013 WHO
1999 WHO∗ 2013 WHO∗ Discordant? n(%) Median HbA1c, mmol/mol Proportion with HbA1c≥42 mmol/mol
Normal Normal No 213 (40.7) 31 1.4%
Normal GDM Yes 62 (11.9) 36 12.9%
GDM Normal Yes 50 (9.5) 34 8.2%
GDM GDM No 198 (37.9) 38 26.2%
C – Case-control study: 2015 NICE versus 2013 WHO
2015 NICE∗ 2013 WHO∗ Discordant? n(%) Median HbA1c, mmol/mol Proportion with HbA1c≥42 mmol/mol
Normal Normal No 213 (40.8) 30 1.4%
Normal GDM Yes 20 (3.8) 33 5.0%
GDM Normal Yes 50 (9.6) 36 8.2%
GDM GDM No 239 (45.8) 37 24.1%
D – Cohort study: 1999 WHO versus 2015 NICE
1999 WHO∗ 2015 NICE∗ Discordant? n(%) Median HbA1c, mmol/mol Proportion with HbA1c≥42 mmol/mol
Normal Normal No 6138 (88.6) 34 2.5%
Normal GDM Yes 119 (1.7) 37 17.7%
GDM Normal Yes 0 - -
GDM GDM No 673 (9.7) 38 22.6%
E – Cohort study: 1999 WHO versus 2013 WHO
1999 WHO∗ 2013 WHO∗ Discordant? n(%) Median HbA1c, mmol/mol Proportion with HbA1c≥42 mmol/mol
Normal Normal No 5,780 (83.4) 33 2.0%
Normal GDM Yes 477 (6.9) 37 13.2%
GDM Normal Yes 203 (2.9) 35 7.4%
GDM GDM No 470 (6.8) 38 29.2%
F – Cohort study: 2015 NICE versus 2013 WHO
2015 NICE∗ 2013 WHO∗ Discordant? n(%) Median HbA1c, mmol/mol Proportion with HbA1c≥42 mmol/mol
Normal Normal No 5,780 (83.4) 34 2.0%
Normal GDM Yes 358 (5.2) 37 11.7%
GDM Normal Yes 203 (2.9) 35 7.4%
GDM GDM No 589 (8.5) 39 26.8%

*Normal is defined as subgroup 1, while GDM is defined as subgroups 2–4 using the categorisation defined in the methods

HbA1c = glycated haemoglobin; NICE = National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; WHO = World Health Organization