Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 11;9:1445. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01445

Table 4.

Risk of bias of the included in vivo studies.

Study A B C D E F G H I J Total
Jiang et al., 1982 3
Tang et al., 1989 3
Li et al., 1996 3
Zhang et al., 2010 5
Lu et al., 2010 3
Li et al., 2012 6
Yin et al., 2013 6
Yu J. et al., 2015 6
Wei et al., 2016 4
Song et al., 2016 6
Fan et al., 2016 6
Li et al., 2016 6
Hu et al., 2016 6
Yin et al., 2017 7
Gao et al., 2017 6
Dong et al., 2009 5
Xiang et al., 2009 4
Cheng et al., 2010 4
Zhao et al., 2012 4
Quan et al., 2012 4
Cui G. et al., 2013 6
Chen et al., 2014 4
Cui et al., 2014 5
Wang et al., 2016 5
Zhang X. et al., 2017 4
Wang et al., 2017 6
Tang et al., 2018 5

Studies fulfilling the criteria of: A, peer reviewed publication; B, control of temperature; C, random allocation to treatment or control; D, blinded induction of model; E, blinded assessment of outcome; F, use of anesthetic without significant intrinsic vascular protection activity; G, appropriate animal model (aged, diabetic, or hypertensive); H, sample size calculation; I, compliance with animal welfare regulations; J, statement of potential conflict of interests.