Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 14;28(1):166–174. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy327

Table 1.

Large-scale meta-analysis in body fat distribution

Phenotype Sex Sample sizes Associated loci
P < 5 × 10 −9
Dimorphic index SNPs
(% of total)
Inline graphic (se) Variance explained
UKBB GIANT Meta Loci Independent signals
Combined 484 563 210 086 694 649 346 463 53 (15.3) 0.174 (0.002) 3.9%
WHRadjBMI Women 262 759 116 742 379 501 266 363 77 (28.9) 0.256 (0.003) 3.6%
Men 221 804 93 480 315 284 91 102 13 (14.3) 0.167 (0.003) 1.0%
Combined 485 486 212 248 697 734 316 382 37 (11.7) 0.194 (0.002) 3.0%
WHR Women 263 148 118 004 381 152 203 261 64 (31.5) 0.254 (0.003) 4.0%
Men 222 338 94 434 316 772 79 82 10 (12.7) 0.208 (0.003) 0.3%

We performed a meta-analysis of fat distribution as measured by WHRadjBMI in up to 694 649 individuals. We performed analyses of WHR as a sensitivity measure. Our analyses increase the number of WHRadjBMI-associated loci (P < 5 × 10−9, to account for SNP density in UK Biobank) to 346 loci. SNP-based heritability (Inline graphic) results, estimated using the REML method implemented (10), and top-associated loci indicate patterns of sex dimorphism. The top-associated index SNPs explain 3.9% of the overall phenotypic variance (i.e. adjusted R2) in fat distribution (calculated in an independent dataset, N = 7721).