Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 18;13(12):e0206887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206887

Table 3. Comparison of global and sectorial retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) measurements by race.

ED
(n = 103)
AD
(n = 78)
MD
(n = 79)

P*
P
Adjusted**
Global 99.59 (9.57)
[81–129]
103.53 (11.59)
[74–132]
103.52 (9.64)
[65–130]
0.01 0.07
Temporal 68.2 (10.45)
[45 – 101]
68.18 (11.91)
[32 – 107]
68.66 (9.53)
[46 – 95]
0.94 0.73
Superotemporal 128.42 (22.27)
[76–172]
128.67 (24.57)
[70–195]
128.8 (21.58)
[76–175]
0.99 0.82
Inferotemporal 154.24 (19.39)
[117–212]
157.14 (20.41)
[93–211]
155.7 (18.84)
[75–198]
0.61 0.95
Nasal 82.9 (13.13)
[55 – 122]
85.21 (15.57)
[48 – 127]
86.47 (11.12)
[61–116]
0.18 0.38
Superonasal 116.72 (23.83)
[66–198]
134.51 (28.07)
[83–214]
127.87 (21.6)
[74–183]
<0.001 <0.001
Inferonasal 116.52 (23.11)
[65–185]
124.12 (21.55)
[78–178]
127.81 (22.52)
[72–200]
0.003 0.009

Values shown are mean (standard deviation) and [range] in μm.

ED: European descent; AD: African descent; MD: Mixed descent

*ANOVA

**ANCOVA to evaluate mean differences in RNFLT between the three racial groups correcting for age and BMO area.

P values<0.05 are shown in bold.