Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biochem Pharmacol. 2018 Sep 25;158:27–34. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2018.09.024

Table 2.

Potency and efficacy of substituted phenethylamines and other compounds at recombinant 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors.

Drug EC50 mean ± sem (nM) (n) % maximum stimulation ± sem* Selectivity (functional ratios)

5-HT1A Stimulation of [35S]GTPγS binding 5-HT2A Stimulation of IP-1 formation 5-HT2B Stimulation of IP-1 formation 5-HT2C Stimulation of IP-1 formation 5-HT2A: 5-HT1A 5-HT2A: 5-HT2B 5-HT2A: 5-HT2C
25D-NBOMe 5900 ± 1900 (4) 55 ± 20% 1.53 ± 0.10 (3) 95.1 ± 6.8% 32.3 ± 6.8 (4) 47.7 ± 8.1% 1.37 ± 0.36 (3) 96.1 ± 2.5% 3900 21 0.90
25E-NBOMe 13700 ± 5600 (6) 38.0 ± 6.2% 0.50 ± 0.14 (4) 87.1 ± 6.6% 23.5 ± 6.0 (5) 49.4 ± 6.8% 0.95 ± 0.18 (3) 91.8 ± 4.4% 27,000 47 1.9
25H-NBOMe 28400 ± 8600 (4) 52 ± 14% 40.7 ± 8.1 (4) 85.9 ± 1.7% 463 ± 71 (4) 37.7 ± 9.0% 13.8 ± 2.6 (3) 95.5 ± 3.0% 700 11 0.34
25I-NBOH 37000 ± 13000 (3) 74 ± 18% 0.76 ± 0.26 (4) 87.5 ± 4.1% 111 ± 13 (4) 21.3 ± 8.3% 2.38 ± 0.72 (3) 94.0 ± 4.0% 49,000 146 3.1
25N-NBOMe 4800 ± 1800 (5) 35.6 ± 6.6% 0.51 ± 0.19 (3) 87.9 ± 3.4% 47 ± 11 (4) 57.6 ± 8.6% 1.32 ± 0.27 (3) 99.4 ± 0.4% 9400 92 2.6
5-HT 2.88 ± 0.61 (6) 94.7 ± 3.6% 19.4 ± 3.7 (8) 98.7 ± 2.7% 6.3 ± 1.2 (5) 100.2 ± 2.8% 2.8 ± 1.0 (6) 98.9 ± 3.3% 0.15 0.32 0.14
LSD 1.31 ± 0.46 (3) 93.2 ± 6.4% 0.706 ± 0.065 (3) 64.5 ± 6.3% 3.07 ± 0.65 (6) 23.3 ± 4.9% 1.74 ± 0.29 (3) 92.5 ± 4.8% 1.9 4.3 2.5
DOM 12800 ± 4700 (3) 74 ± 25% 39.9 ± 5.4 (3) 94.6 ± 4.1% 145 ± 47 (4) 96.2 ± 3.2% 21.9 ± 5.9 (3) 96.0 ± 4.0% 320 3.6 0.55

(n) Number of independent experiments conducted in duplicate.

*

Drug-induced stimulation is normalized to the maximal stimulation by 5-HT.