Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 18;7:e38174. doi: 10.7554/eLife.38174

Figure 1. Measurement of the inoculum effect and peptide absorption by E. coli cells.

(A) A two-dimensional dilution scheme, which includes a linear dilution of LL37 peptides in columns 7 and 12 followed by two separate 2/3 dilution series of the cells and LL37 peptides on columns 12 to 8 and 7 to 1. (B) Each well represents a different combination of densities of LL37 peptides and E. coli cells from which we can extract the MIC as a function of inoculum size by monitoring growth of the culture in individual wells. The solid data points refer to the wells with growing culture and different marker symbols refer to the number of repeated trial outcomes that resulted in growing cultures. The empty data points refer to wells with no visible growth. A theoretical model developed later in this work nicely fits the average MIC. Data represent four biological repeats where the average and standard deviations of MIC are depicted with black symbols and lines. (C) The growth of the cultures were monitored by an automated plate reader in terms of OD600. Growing cultures reach a yield comparable to each other while non-growing cultures do not exhibit consistent increase in OD600. Data are examples from column 11 of Figure 1AB and they follow the same color coding. (D) Analysis of the growth in sub-MIC cultures reveal that growth is delayed depending on the LL37 concentration, but the doubling time of the cells shows no considerable change. Data are from the same experiments as in panel B and follow the same color coding as panels A and B. (E) Through colorimetric measurement of the concentration of a fluorescently tagged analogue of LL37 peptide (5-FAM-LC-LL37), we can quantify the amount of peptides remaining in the supernatant after incubation with E. coli cells. (F) The amount of 5-FAM-LC-LL37 peptides remaining in the supernatant decreases with inoculum size (the initial AMP concentration is 14 µM). The amount of absorbed AMPs by the cells are inferred by subtracting the final (supernatant) from the initial concentration of AMPs. The results are the average of 4 biological repeats. Average and standard deviations are depicted in the figure.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. The full experimental data obtained from the microplate reader consisting of the four trials performed as reported in Figure 1 of the main text.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

Each box refers to one well, where the red curve shows the growth in terms of OD600, the black overlap shows the detected exponential growth region, and the blue line depicts the exponential fit to the data. The two numbers in each box represent the calculated doubling time (in the top) and the T0.1 (in the bottom) both in terms of minutes. The T0.1 refers to the time point where the OD600 first hits 0.1. The boxes with no number and gray curve refer to the wells that did not show any growth.
Figure 1—figure supplement 2.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2.

(A) A histogram of E.coli population grown in RDM to various OD600 in hemocytometer grids with a measured volume of 50×50×20μm3. (B) The linear regression of the cell density as a function of OD600 provides a conversion factor for the calculation of respective cell densities beginning with OD600. Red refer to the cells grown in RDM and blue refer to a separate experiment where the same strain was grown in RDM in the presence of 1μg∕mL cephalexin.