Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 4;14:100209. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2018.100209

Table 4.

Comparison between biological reconstruction and prosthetic replacement.

Reconstruction Biological reconstruction Prosthetic replacement p value
Number of literatures 26 9
Followup duration (mon), mean (range) 67.2 (6–288) 78.4 (12–324) 0.251
MSTS (%), mean (range) 78.4 (20–100) 72.2 (50–90) 0.017
Fracture (%) (cases) 10.3 (26/253) /
Deep infection (%) (cases) 6.7 (17/253) 16.2 (6/37) 0.095
Nonunion (%) (cases) 7.5 (19/253) /
Loosening (%) (cases) / 13.5 (5/37)
Talar collapse (%) (cases) / 5.4 (2/37)
Local relapse (%) (cases) 9.1 (23/253) 13.5 (5/37) 0.580