Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 18;19:944. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-5290-9

Table 2.

Performance of MGE detection in iMGEins, popoolationTE, TEMP, RetroSeq and MELT in simulation set 2

Low coverage (30x) Hogh coverage (90x)
iMGEins PoPoolationTE TEMP RetroSeq MELT iMGEins PoPoolationTE TEMP RetroSeq MELT
True positive
 Human MGEs 78 75 80 19 72 75 2 80 27 74
 Primate MGEs 77 74 78 20 37 78 10 79 31 39
 Novel insertions 77 0 0 1 0 77 0 0 0 0
 Total 232 149 158 40 109 231 12 159 58 113
False Positive
 Human MGEs 0 0 31 121 6 0 1 56 117 5
 Primate MGEs 0 1 10 188 21 0 1 40 289 21
 Novel insertions 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 43 0
 Total 0 1 41 342 27 0 2 96 449 26
Recall (%)
 Human MGEs 97.50 93.75 100.00 23.75 90.00 93.75 2.50 100.00 33.75 92.50
 Primate MGEs 96.25 92.50 97.50 25.00 46.25 97.50 12.50 98.75 38.75 48.75
 Novel insertions 96.25 -a 1.25 96.25 0.00
 Average
  Completeb
  MGE onlyc
96.67 62.08
93.13
65.83
98.75
16.67 45.42
68.13
95.83 5.00
7.5
66.25
99.38
24.17 47.08
70.63
Precision (%)
 Human MGEs 100.00 100.00 72.07 13.57 92.31 100.00 66.67 58.82 18.75 93.67
 Primate MGEs 100.00 98.67 88.64 9.62 63.79 100.00 90.91 66.39 9.69 65.00
 Novel insertions 100.00 2.94 100.00 0.00
 Average 100.00 99.333 79.40 10.47 80.15 100.00 85.71 62.35 11.44 81.29

aThese programs cannot find novel insertions

bThe rates for the entire test case

cThe rates without the novel insertion category