Table 4.
Accuracy: pairwise comparisons of the estimated marginal means for each naming condition in each stimulation site for the subgroup of participants who showed MEP amplitude reduction post-stimulation (n = 15).
| Contrasts | Estimate | SE | z.ratio | Lower CL | Upper CL | p-valuea |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CS, mat – MC, mat | 0.716 | 0.299 | 2.392 | 0.129 | 1.303 | 0.05 |
| CS, mis – MC, mis | 0.067 | 0.275 | 0.244 | –0.473 | 0.607 | 1 |
| CS, neutral – MC, neutral | 0.337 | 0.275 | 1.225 | –0.202 | 0.876 | 0.66 |
aBonferroni correction; Results are given on the log (not response) scale; CS = control site stimulation; MC = motor cortex stimulation; lower CL = asymptotic confidence limit; upper CL = upper asymptotic confidence limit.