Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomed Inform. 2018 Jul 17;85:168–188. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.07.015

Table 8:

Summary of score contributions for main effect dataset in Table 6 yielding ReliefF, SURF, SURF*, MultiSURF*, and MultiSURF scores. Illustrates why ‘far’ scoring hinders main effect detection.

Features RBA Scoring Schemes

A1 A2 A3 ReliefF SURF SURF* MultiSURF* MultiSURF

Farthest. Hit (same value) 8 0 0 − 1
Farthest Miss (same value) 0 0 0 +1

Nearest Hit (different value) 0 0 0 − 1 − 1 − 1 − 1 − 1
Nearest Miss (different value) 8 0 0 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1

Farthest Hit (different value) 0 8 8 +1
Farthest Miss (different value) 8 8 8 − 1

ReliefF Score Total 8 0 0

SURF Score Total 8 0 0

SURF* Score Total 0 0 0

MultiSURF* Score Total 0 0 0

MultiSURF Score Total 8 0 0