Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 19.
Published in final edited form as: Horm Metab Res. 2017 Aug 23;49(10):786–792. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-116385

Table 2.

Lipofuscin scoring in CPA tissuses (with and without the PRKACA mutation) compared to positive (PPNAD) and negative controls (Conn adenoma and peritumoral tissues).

Tissues Sample numbers Number of lipofuscin granules per slide (mean±SD) Presence of lipofuscin Statistcal significance (p)
CPAs 10 46.9±9.5 +++ p*=0.0001
PRKACA somatic mutation 4 53.5±55.8 +++ p**=0.145
No PPKACA mutation 6 28.2±56.8 ++
PPNADs 3 73.3±109.76 +++ p***=0.89
Peritumoral tissues 5 1.6±1.8
Conn adenoma 4 3.8±4.8

Grading of lipofuscin pigmentation in H & E staining slides: intense (+++) ≥40 lipofuscin-pigment granules per slide; moderate (++)=20–40; faint (+)=10–20; negative (–) ≤10

*

Comparison of the number of lipofuscin granules per slide of CPAs (n=10 tissues) tissues vs. Conn adenomas (n=4) and peritumoral tissues (n=5)

***

Comparison of the number of lipofuscin granules per slide of PPNAD (n=3) tissues vs. CPAs tissues (n=10); CPAs: Cortisol producing adenomas; PPNAD: Primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease