Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 19;13(12):e0209240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209240

Table 2. Overview of the identified studies.

Study (Year) Interventions Country Population Reference
Surgery compared to non-surgical initial treatment
Anterior cruciate ligament injury
Gottlob et al (1999) ACL reconstruction with a patellar tendon autograft compared to rehabilitation, counselling and functional bracing. The United States Young adults in their late teens and 20’s, acute ACL tear. [26]
Mather III et al (2013) ACL reconstruction compared to structured rehabilitation plus optional delayed reconstruction. The United States General population age 12–45 years, ACL tear. [27]
Mather III et al (2012) Early ACL reconstruction compared to rehabilitation. The United States General population age 12–45 years, ACL tear. [28]
Stewart et al (2016) ACL reconstruction compared to physical therapy. The United States Competitive athletes, complete ACL tear. [29]
Farshad et al (2011) Surgical ACL reconstruction compared to conservative treatment. Switzerland General population, average age of 30–35 years, ACL rupture. [30]
Kiadaliri et al (2016) Structured rehabilitation plus early ACL reconstruction compared to structured rehabilitation plus optional delayed ACL reconstruction. Sweden Active adults, 18–35 years of age, acute ACL injury. [31]
Bierbaum et al (2017) DIS reconstruction compared to wait and see (muscular training plus delayed ACL reconstruction). Germany Patients with an isolated rupture of the ACL with or without meniscal injury. [32]
Surgery compared to surgery management
Cartilage defects
Derrett et al (2005) Autologous chondrocyte implantation compared to mosaicplasty. United Kingdom General population, 16+ years, chondral or osteochondral lesions of >1 cm diameter. [33]
Elvidge et al (2016) Characterised Chondrocyte implantation compared to microfracture. United Kingdom General population, aged 18–50, cartilage damage. [34]
Gerlier et al (2010) ChondroCelect cell therapy compared to microfracture. Belgium Adult patients, aged <50 years, symptomatic cartilage lesions of the femoral condyles. [35]
Traumatic meniscus injury
Rongen et al (2016) Meniscus scaffold procedure compared to standard meniscectomy The Netherlands General population, mean age of 39 years, patients with an acute traumatic or degenerative irreparable medial meniscus injury. [36]
Ramme et al (2016) Meniscal allograft transplantation compared to partial meniscectomy. The United States Active athletic women, aged 25–30 years old with normal BMI, discoid lateral meniscus tears. [37]
Anterior cruciate ligament
Paxton et al (2010) Single-bundle versus double-bundle autograft ACL reconstruction. The United States Young healthy person, ACL tear [38]
Genuario et al (2012) Bone–patellar tendon–bone autografts, quadrupled hamstring tendon autografts, and allografts compared with each other. The United States Subjects in a sports medicine clinic, ACL injury. [39]
Exercise compared to usual care
Patellofemoral pain syndrome
Tan et al (2010) Exercise therapy compared to ‘‘usual care”. The Netherlands Adolescents and young adults, age 14–40 years, PFPS. [40]

ACL: anterior cruciate ligament, BMI: body mass index, DIS: dynamic intraligamentary stabilization, PFPS: patellofemoral pain syndrome.