Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 5;42(6):488–495. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2018.0022

Table 2. Multivariate linear regression analysis of the prediction of HOMA-IR and QUICKI at 10-year follow-up.

Independent variable HOMA-IR QUICKI
Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2
βa P value βa P value βa P value βa P value
Age, yr −0.020 0.695 −0.119 0.034 0.043 0.408 0.141 0.013
Female sex −0.224 0.004 −0.058 0.524 0.201 0.012 0.030 0.741
BMI, kg/m2 0.326 <0.001 0.290 0.004 −0.360 <0.001 −0.308 0.003
Thigh muscle area, cm2 −0.254 0.010 −0.232 0.020 0.244 0.017 0.224 0.027
HOMA-IR 0.420 <0.001 0.342 <0.001 - - - -
QUICKI - - - - 0.372 <0.001 0.298 <0.001
Fasting plasma glucose, mg/dL - - 0.171 0.001 - - −0.168 0.002
Total abdominal fat area, cm2 - - 0.105 0.187 - - −0.128 0.117
Thigh subcutaneous fat area, cm2 - - −0.135 0.033 - - 0.148 0.021

Model 1: adjusted for baseline traits (age, sex, BMI, thigh muscle area, and HOMA-IR); Model 2: model 1+fasting plasma glucose, total abdominal fat area, and thigh subcutaneous fat area.

HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; QUICKI, quantitative insulin sensitivity check index; BMI, body mass index.

aData are expressed as standardized β.