Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 13;9:1046. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01046

Table 2.

Interventional and clinical outcome in patients with tandem occlusions treated using the antegrade vs. retrograde approach.

Antegrade approach (n = 46) Retrograde approach (n = 75) P
INTERVENTIONAL
Age (years) 70 (63–79) 70 (63–76) 0.871
Sex, female 32.6% (15/46) 21.3% (16/31) 0.200
Admission NIHSS 18 (13–21) 16 (10–19) 0.077
Procedure time 95 (IQR 53–141) 82 (IQR 61–109) 0.251
Number of maneuvers 2 (IQR 1–3) 1 (IQR 1–2) 0.017
Intracranial final TICI 2b/3 65.2% (30/46) 73.3% (55/75) 0.414
Complications 0.305
- None
- Dissection
- Perforation
- Other
- 89.1% (41/46)
- 10.9% (5/56)
- 0% (0/46)
- 0% (0/46)
- 89.3% (67/75)
- 5.3% (4/75)
- 4.0% (3/75)
- 1.3% (1/75)
Infarct in previously unaffected territories 13.0% (6/46) 4.0% (3/75) 0.082
sICH 10.9% (5/46) 10.7% (8/75) 1.000
aICH 28.3% (13/46) 30.7% (23/75) 0.840
Rethrombosis during acute treatment 4.3% (2/46) 9.3% (7/75) 0.480
ICA patency at end of procedure 100% (46/46) 97.3% (73/75) 0.525
ICA patency at day 7 93.5% (43/46) 85.1% (63/74) 0.244
90-day mRS 3 (IQR 1–4) 3 (IQR 1–5) 0.300
90-day mRS ≤ 2 46.7% (21/45) 39.7% (29/73) 0.565
90-day mortality 15.6% (7/45) 21.9% (16/73) 0.478