Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 13;9:1045. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01045

Table 2.

Variance accounted for (VAF) measures expressed as percentages obtained from comparisons of experimental and model simulated responses to balance perturbations in the 8 test conditions.

Test condition VAF PD + torque feedback model VAF PID model
1: Surf Stim 2°, Eyes Closed 95.1 (2.9) 94.9 (3.6)
2: Surf Stim 4°, Eyes Closed 94.7 (3.2) 95.1 (4.3)
3: Surf Stim 2°, Eyes Open 94.2 (5.6) 92.4 (11.0)
4: Surf Stim 4°, Eyes Open 94.0 (5.8) 89.2 (14.1)
5: Vis Stim 2°, Eyes Open 73.2 (22.3) 74.9 (23.2)
6: Vis Stim 4°, Eyes Open 75.1 (19.9) 76.3 (20.9)
7: Surf+Vis Stim 2°, Eyes Open 97.3 (1.3) 96.2 (2.6)
8: Surf+Vis Stim 4°, Eyes Open 96.2 (2.3) 96.7 (2.2)

Mean and standard deviation (SD) values are based on 40 subjects except for Condition five where one subject's parameters were not consistent with a stable system and were excluded.