. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 20.

Published in final edited form as: Am Sociol Rev. 2017 Oct 12;82(6):1241–1271. doi: 10.1177/0003122417734353

Table 5.

The Effect of Youth Violent Victimization on Competing Risks of Progression to First Cohabitation versus First Marriage (Cox Regression Models)

	First Cohabitation			First Marriage
	b	(SE)	HR	b	(SE)	HR
Youth Violent Victimization	.302^**^a^,^c	(.111)	1.353	.783^**^b	(.225)	2.240
Youth Violent Victimization x Time	−.007^***	(.002)	.993	−.006^*	(.003)	.993
N of Events^d		3,810			905
N of Respondents^d	6, 976

Source: National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), 1994 to 2008.

Note: b = hazard coefficient; SE = standard error; HR = hazard ratio (HR) = exp(b). Estimates are weighted and adjusted for complex survey design. Models also include all the controls listed in Table 3.

Joint effects of YVV and YVV x time are statistically significant (Wald χ², F (2,126.0) = 9.25 p = .0002).

Joint effects of YVV and YVV x time are statistically significant (Wald χ², F (2,125.4) = 6.75, p = .0017).

Marginally significant difference (t = 1.917, p = .0553) between the coefficient for cohabitation and the coefficient for marriage.

Unweighted N.

p < .05;

^**

p < .01;

^***

p < .001 (two-tailed tests).