Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Fam Econ Issues. 2018 May 16;39(4):600–615. doi: 10.1007/s10834-018-9577-4

Table 2.

Logistic regressions predicting unintended first birth

Variables Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
B (SE) B (SE) B (SE)
Net wealth decile −0.13*** (0.03) −0.11** (0.04)
Black 0.51* (0.21) 0.37 (0.21) 0.37 (0.27)
Latina 0.12 (0.22) 0.03 (0.23) 0.37 (0.27)
20–24 0.83 (0.60)
25–29 −0.02 (0.53)
30–34 −0.38 (0.43)
Divorced/separated/widow 1.23*** (0.23) 1.20*** (0.24) 1.35*** (0.24)
Never married 2.09*** (0.21) 1.89*** (0.22) 2.01*** (0.23)
Low AFQT score −0.39 (0.26)
Less than high school 0.08 (0.41) −0.22 (0.40) −0.29 (0.46)
High school 0.22 (0.22) 0.03 (0.23) −0.09 (0.26)
Some college 0.25 (0.24) 0.13 (0.24) −0.01 (0.25)
Income at conception −0.00 (0.01)
Mother had low education −0.12 (0.22)
Lived with bio parents −0.06 (0.22)
Born outside of US −0.31 (0.37)
Lived in urban area 0.51* (0.25)
Lived in the South 0.01 (0.21)
No literacy materials in HH −0.55 (0.35)
Catholic −0.24 (0.31)
Liberal protestant 0.08 (0.34)
Conservative protestant 0.12 (0.29)
Year of conception 0.02 (0.04)
Family size at conception 0.02 (0.07)
Constant −2.50*** (0.18) −1.61*** (0.28) −45.90 (79.94)
Observations 1508 1508 1508

Robust standard errors in parentheses

***

p < 0.001,

**

p < 0.01,

*

p < 0.05