Table 5.
Moderation analysis
| Variables | Model 1 |
Model 2 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interaction with respondent’s age at birth |
Interaction with respondent’s marital status at birth |
|||
| B | (SE) | B | (SE) | |
| Net wealth decile | −0.03 | (0.12) | −0.16*** | (0.05) |
| 20–24 | 1.77 | (0.98) | 0.87 | (0.60) |
| 25–29 | 0.60 | (0.94) | 0.05 | (0.52) |
| 30–34 | 0.01 | (0.89) | −0.32 | (0.43) |
| 20–24 × Net wealth | −0.17 | (0.13) | ||
| 25–29 × Net wealth | −0.09 | (0.13) | ||
| 30–34 × Net wealth | −0.05 | (0.12) | ||
| Divorced/separated/widow | 1.33*** | (0.24) | 0.77 | (0.55) |
| Never married | 1.98*** | (0.23) | 1.58*** | (0.39) |
| Divorced/separated/widow × Net wealth | 0.11 | (0.09) | ||
| Never married × Net wealth | 0.09 | (0.08) | ||
| Black | 0.39 | (0.27) | 0.38 | (0.26) |
| Latina | 0.33 | (0.27) | 0.35 | (0.27) |
| Low AFQT score | −0.37 | (0.26) | −0.39 | (0.25) |
| Less than high school | −0.31 | (0.47) | −0.27 | (0.46) |
| High school | −0.08 | (0.26) | −0.09 | (0.26) |
| Some college | 0.00 | (0.25) | −0.02 | (0.25) |
| Income at conception ($10,000) | −0.00 | (0.01) | −0.00 | (0.01) |
| Mother had low education | −0.12 | (0.23) | −0.12 | (0.22) |
| Lived with bio parents | −0.06 | (0.22) | −0.08 | (0.21) |
| Born outside of US | −0.32 | (0.37) | −0.34 | (0.37) |
| Lived in urban area (age 14) | 0.51* | (0.25) | 0.51* | (0.25) |
| Lived in the South (age 14) | 0.03 | (0.21) | 0.03 | (0.21) |
| No literacy materials in HH | −0.57 | (0.35) | −0.53 | (0.35) |
| Catholic | −0.23 | (0.32) | −0.23 | (0.31) |
| Liberal protestant | 0.08 | (0.35) | 0.07 | (0.34) |
| Conservative protestant | 0.11 | (0.30) | 0.10 | (0.29) |
| Year of conception | 0.02 | (0.04) | 0.02 | (0.04) |
| Family size at conception | 0.01 | (0.07) | 0.02 | (0.07) |
| Constant | −44.85 | (79.25) | −40.59 | (80.09) |
| Observations | 1508 | 1508 | ||
Robust standard errors in parentheses;
***
p < 0.001,
**
p < 0.01,
*
p < 0.05