Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 May 6;42(6):1733–1739. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24944

TABLE 2.

Comparison of the Average Estimated Prostate Volumes and PSADs Between 100 Non-PCa and 53 High-Gleason-Sum (Gleason Score ≥ 7) PCa Patients

Variable Non-PCa High-Gleason-sum PCa P-valuea
Total prostate volume (cm3) 67.0 ± 42.3 44.2 ± 19.5 0.00002
PZ volume (cm3) 21.5 ± 6.7 19.7 ± 6.0 0.07
CG volume (cm3) 45.5 ± 39.0 24.5 ± 17.2 < 0.00001
CG ratio 0.62 ± 0.13 0.52 ± 0.11 < 0.00001
PSA (ng/mL) 8.7 ± 6.3 10.9 ± 13.9 0.2
PSAD (ng/mL/cm3) 0.15 ± 0.12 0.25 ± 0.25 0.001
PSAD-CG (ng/mL/cm3) 0.26 ± 0.24 0.51 ± 0.55 0.00002

PSA: prostate-specific antigen; PCa: prostate cancer; PZ: peripheral zone; CG: central gland; PSAD: PSA density; PSAD-CG: CG volume-adjusted PSA.

a

A critical value of 0.05 was used for statistical significance; after Bonferroni correction, the critical value was adjusted to 0.05/7 = 0.007.