Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 18.
Published in final edited form as: Immunity. 2018 Dec 11;49(6):1090–1102.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.10.009

Figure 2. Expansion and differentiation of Se epitope-specific Th1 cells in Seinfected mice.

Figure 2.

(A)Plots of LpdAp:I-Ab-specific CD4+ T cells from uninfected (left) or Se-infected (right) mice 60 days after infection identified by tetramer-based cell enrichment and flow cytometry. (B)Mean numbers (± S.D.) of LpdAp:I-Ab tetramer+ CD4+ T cells in the indicated organs of 129 mice at the indicated times after Se infection. (C)Representative histograms showing intracellular T-bet staining of CD44low naïve CD4+ T cells and CD44high LpdAp:I-Ab tetramer+ CD4+ T cells from the same Se-infected mouse. (D)Representative contour plots of LpdAp:I-Ab tetramer+ CD4+ T cells from day 60 Se-Tomato infected 129 mice. (E)Mean numbers (± S.E.M., n ≥ 3 mice per group/timepoint) of LpdAp:I-Ab tetramer+ CXCR3+ or CX3CR1+ CD4+ T cells in the spleens of 129 mice at the indicated times after Se infection. Significance was determined on log-transformed values using twoway ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons post-test (** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001). (F)Mean CFU (± geometric S.D.) per spleen from 129 mice that received total (n = 4), CXCR3+ (n = 5), CX3CR1+ (n = 4), or no CD4+ memory T cells (n = 5) from day 60 Se-infected 129 mice, seven days after intravenous infection with 104 Se-Tomato bacteria. Log-transformed values were compared using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons post-test (* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001, n.s. = not significant) and is derived from three independent experiments.