Table 4. Classification performance of L1 logistic regression (L1-LR) and support vector machine (SVM) approaches for 96 subjects using IBIF features.
Mean (standard deviation) is reported for the performance metrics. Previous results using 51 pairs [3] and 20 pairs [16] are also shown. It is worth noting that the distribution of metrics such as AUC, across all models, may be non-normal and may benefit from other summary statistics such as median (IQR).
Method | AUC | Accuracy | F-score | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Threshold |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L1-LR (IBIF) | 0.82 (0.25) | 0.83 (0.14) | 0.77 (0.27) | 0.78 (0.29) | 0.85 (0.22) | 0.81 (0.21) | 0.82 (0.18) | 0.54 (0.25) |
SVM (IBIF) | 0.82 (0.26) | 0.84 (0.14) | 0.78 (0.27) | 0.79 (0.28) | 0.84 (0.24) | 0.83 (0.22) | 0.82 (0.21) | 0.02 (0.67) |
Mehta et al. [3] | 0.74 (0.27) | - | 0.77 (0.20) | 0.74 (0.30) | 0.77 (0.29) | - | - | - |
Ghassemi et al. [16] | 0.71 (-) | 0.66 (-) | 0.63 (-) | 0.50 (-) | 0.81 (-) | 0.72 (-) | 0.62 (-) | - |