Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 20;13(12):e0209017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209017

Table 4. Classification performance of L1 logistic regression (L1-LR) and support vector machine (SVM) approaches for 96 subjects using IBIF features.

Mean (standard deviation) is reported for the performance metrics. Previous results using 51 pairs [3] and 20 pairs [16] are also shown. It is worth noting that the distribution of metrics such as AUC, across all models, may be non-normal and may benefit from other summary statistics such as median (IQR).

Method AUC Accuracy F-score Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV Threshold
L1-LR (IBIF) 0.82 (0.25) 0.83 (0.14) 0.77 (0.27) 0.78 (0.29) 0.85 (0.22) 0.81 (0.21) 0.82 (0.18) 0.54 (0.25)
SVM (IBIF) 0.82 (0.26) 0.84 (0.14) 0.78 (0.27) 0.79 (0.28) 0.84 (0.24) 0.83 (0.22) 0.82 (0.21) 0.02 (0.67)
Mehta et al. [3] 0.74 (0.27) - 0.77 (0.20) 0.74 (0.30) 0.77 (0.29) - - -
Ghassemi et al. [16] 0.71 (-) 0.66 (-) 0.63 (-) 0.50 (-) 0.81 (-) 0.72 (-) 0.62 (-) -