Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 31;5(4):219–229. doi: 10.15441/ceem.17.268

Table 3.

Diagnostic characteristics of the risk scores for the composite outcome among patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Risk scores Cut-off point No. of patients (%) SN/SP PPV/NPV +LR/-LR
NEWS+L 3 34 (6.4) 100.0/7.2 11.9/100 1.08/-
4 92 (17.4) 98.3/19.3 13.2/98.9 1.22/0.09
5 171 (32.3) 96.6/35.9 15.9/98.8 1.51/0.09
PERS 0 56 (10.6) 94.9/11.3 11.8/94.6 1.07/0.45
GBS 0 13 (2.5) 98.3/2.6 11.2/92.3 1.01/0.67
AIMS65 0 159 (30.0) 91.5/32.7 14.6/96.9 1.36/0.26

The cut-off points were chosen to identify the low-risk patient group. Composite outcome of in-hospital death, intensive care unit admission, and red blood cell transfusions requiring ≥5 packs within 24 hours.

SN, sensitivity; SP, specificity; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; +LR, positive likelihood ratio; -LR, negative likelihood ratio; NEWS+L, National Early Warning Score+Lactate; PERS, pre-endoscopic Rockall score; GBS, Glasgow-Blatchford score; AIMS65, albumin, international normalized ratio, altered mental status, systolic blood pressure, age older than 65 years score.